My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003 CC Minutes
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2003
>
2003 CC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2006 8:29:24 AM
Creation date
10/14/2005 1:11:07 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
323
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />to directionally drill the water if the street is not being constructed but it is less expensive <br />than the assessment would be for the entire project, water and street, by open cutting. He <br />then said that the City is looking into whether it is more cost effective to reconstruct the <br />street at this time even though the assessment would be higher now; it may make sense if <br />the overall assessment for water at this time and street in a few years would be higher. <br /> <br />Ms. Seeley indicated she is not opposed to one or the other, but had only heard the <br />figures for directional drilling and she would be interested in the figures for open cutting. <br />She then said she would not like to have the roads tom up for a long period of time and <br />would prefer to keep the assessment as low as possible. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that Council needed better and more <br />information on the open cutting option for street reconstruction prior to making a <br />determination. <br /> <br />Ms. Seeley indicated that every time she hears the figures, they are increasing and it <br />makes her nervous because at the informational meeting, it was $5,100 and now it is <br />proposed for $12,000 for streets and water. Mayor Sweeney indicated the $5,100 for <br />water is still the number one option; however, the City asked for more information <br />including the street reconstruction. <br /> <br />Ms. Seeley indicated the need for road repair would be caused by the development as the <br />roads currently do not need repair. She then said that she feels the developer should bear <br />the cost of the road reconstruction and not the residents. She further commented that <br />most residents have wells and do not need the improvements, but the developer does to <br />make his money from the development. <br /> <br />Mr. Schluender indicated the developer will be required to escrow monies for Mill Road <br />and Peltier Lake Road and those monies will be held for an overlay for any damage <br />caused by the construction traffic. <br /> <br />Ms. Seeley indicated that Mill Road is starting to degrade and putting this kind of traffic <br />on it will degrade it even faster. <br /> <br />Ms. Seeley said she would appreciate spreading the cost of the road repair to the <br />developer as he stands to make a lot of money. She then asked if it would be possible to <br />include the 13 households that were not included in the assessments to lower the <br />assessment overall for the other residents. She further commented that the last <br />assessment for water was $4,330 and theirs is $5,100. Ms. Moore-Sykes explained that <br />the assessment for the 13 homes that were not previously assessed would be very close to <br />that of the other residents for this project after inflation and said that it is not possible to <br />include those 13 residents to lower the assessment for the other 45. <br /> <br />Ms. Renee Lee, 7268 Clearwater Drive, asked why she had never seen anything about <br />advertisements for bids on the project and asked where the numbers for the assessments <br />came from. Mayor Sweeney explained the figures are the Engineer's estimate. <br /> <br />Page 7 of17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.