My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002 CC Minutes
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2002
>
2002 CC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/25/2006 8:26:23 AM
Creation date
10/14/2005 1:57:15 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
505
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Centerville <br />March 13, 2002 <br />Council Minutes <br />then commented that by working together the Jake cat'1 be protected and can be enjoyed <br />by an citizens. <br /> <br />Ms. Amy Donlin, a resident of Lino Lakes indicated her &ther is Art Hawkins and he <br />could not attend the meeting. She then read a letter he had written for Council expressing <br />his support of the no wake ordinance to protect the island and the north arm of the Jake. <br /> <br />Ms. Donlin indicated she is on the Environmental Board in Lino Lakes and has been <br />working on the Ordinance. She then said that herons do not care abut research and <br />graphs all they care about is that Lino Lakes and Centerville and Peltier island are <br />compatible and they are living with the eagles and nesting in harmony. She then said she <br />thinks the City should use the experts and take heed of their advice. <br /> <br />Ms. Donlin indicated she feels a sunset clause is a ridiculous idea and said she is not <br />ashamed to say she feels the 400 foot setback is very appropriate when you consider the <br />pounding the island takes from the wakes of boats. <br /> <br />Council Member Capra said she believes that it is not legal to attach a sunset provision to <br />an ordinance and noted the matter is under investigation. <br /> <br />Ms. Shelly Farmerie, 7425 Pekier Lake Drive, indicated she is a software engineer for a <br />medical company and has learned to become very fuctua1 and she would like to see <br />numbers and charts outlining the decline of the birds or decrease in water quality due to <br />boating. She then commented she has many questions and no answers. <br /> <br />Ms. Farmerie indicated that the bog poles are already in position so it would be <br />economical to use them and the maintenance of those bog poles would be easier than that <br />of buoys. She then indicated that buoys are unsightly for those Jake owners that have to <br />look at them every day. She further expressed concern that the angle of the proposed no <br />wake line concerns her because of possible interaction of high-speed boats with <br />swimmers closer to shore. <br /> <br />Ms. Farmerie indicated that the Lake Association held a meeting and those in attendance <br />worked together to come up with a recommendation to present to Council. She then said <br />she feels the options presented are good ones and she does not feel the rookery is failing <br />for any one reason and asked Council to consider the proposal of the Lake Association. <br /> <br />Ms. Coral Wilkens, 7231 Mill Road, indicated she uses the lake for water-skiing and has <br />been a competitive skier for 19 years. She then said that the American Water Ski <br />Association as well as the Minnesota Water Ski Association bas always strived to use the <br />lakes in a responsible manner. She then commented that high-speed boaters have been <br />targeted as the group to blame for what is happening out at the rookery but she feels <br />having a no wake zone will not end the human encroachment at the rookery. She further <br />commented that she feels Council should take the summer to conduct a study to identify <br />the true cause of the fililing at the rookery. <br /> <br />Page 60f21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.