My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-10-12 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2005
>
2005-10-12 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2006 2:38:26 PM
Creation date
10/28/2005 11:34:17 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City ofCenterville <br />C01mcil Meeting Minutes <br />September 14,2005 <br /> <br />Council Member Paar said he understands needing to maintain but wants to maintain <br />consistency with enforcement of nothing in the easement. <br /> <br />Mayor Capra said she sees the bridges as a different thing than the docks to maintain the <br />easement area as required and she would like this to go to Planning and Zoning. <br /> <br />Council Member Terway said that if they cannot access the remainder of the property <br />then he would be willing to consider it and feels that is different than a dock that is not a <br />necessity. <br /> <br />Mayor Capra said that she does not think it is feasible to have a removable bridge to <br />access the rest of the property as that is a hardship for residents. <br /> <br />Council Member Lakso disagreed because the bridges have made it easy for the ones that <br />put bridges out but there are not very many bridges so many other residents are handling <br />this a different way already. <br /> <br />Council Member Lee indicated he does not want to pick and choose to whom the <br />Ordinance applies. <br /> <br />Mayor Capra indicated that the City does allow fences in the easement. She then said she <br />wanted to amend Ordinance #4 to allow for bridges. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft provided clarification to Council that the bridge that was before <br />Council at the last meeting is a bridge across the area that has defined water in it but the <br />bridge accesses property on the other side that is still drainage easement and he is not <br />sure that the City should be condoning access to it for mowing and landscaping as the <br />property is drainage easement. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft asked how Staff would create guidelines or a policy on where those <br />bridges would be allowed and how do you define the area to be allowed. He then said <br />that it would be difficult to determine if the bridge goes from a resident's property to a <br />drainage easement or more property that is outside of the easement. He further <br />commented that he would recommend the City not do things on a case by case basis. <br /> <br />Motion bv Council Member Lakso. seconded bv Council Member Lee to direct Staff <br />to inform residents to remove bride:es in drainae:e easements bv October 31. 2005. <br />Aves - 4. Navs - HCaora). Motion carried. <br /> <br />IX. ANNOUNCEMENTSIUPDA TES <br /> <br />1. City Administrator. Mr. Dallas Larson <br /> <br />Page 7 of9 <br /> <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.