Laserfiche WebLink
<br />model evolved to one which assumes that <br /> <br />The environment never influences behavior directly, but only through the brain. Any model of crime prevention <br />must include both the brain and the physical environment. ... Because the approach contained in Jeffery's <br />CPTED model is today based on many fields, including scientific knowledge of modern brain sciences, a focus <br />on only external environmental crime prevention is inadequate as it ignores another entire dimension of CPTED <br />-- i.e., the internal environment. (Robinson, 1996) <br /> <br />Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (1991) by criminologist Tim Crowe provided a solid base for <br />CPTED to move forward into the rest of the 1990s. <br /> <br />In 1997, an article by Greg Saville and Gerry Cleveland, 2nd Generation CPTED, exhorted CPTED practitioners to <br />consider the original social ecology origins of CPTED, including social and psychological issues beyond the built <br />environment. <br /> <br />2000s <br /> <br />As of 2004, elements of the CPTED approach have gained wide international acceptance due to law enforcement <br />attempts to embrace it. The CPTED term "environment" is commonly used to refer to the external environment of the <br />place. Jeffrey's intention that CPTED also embrace the internal environment of the offender seems to have been lost, <br />even on those promoting the expansion of CPTED to include social ecology and psychology under the banner of 2nd <br />Generation CPTED. <br /> <br />Strategies for the built environment <br /> <br />CPTED strategies rely upon the ability to influence offender decisions that precede criminal acts. Research into <br />criminal behavior shows that the decision to offend or not to offend is more influenced by cues to the perceived risk of <br />being caught than by cues to reward or ease of entry. Consistent with this research, CPTED based strategies emphasise <br />enhancing the perceived risk of detection and apprehension. <br /> <br />Consistent with the widespread implementation of defensible space guidelines in the 1970s, most implementations of <br />CPTED as of 2004 are based solely upon the theory that the proper design and effective use of the built environment <br />can reduce crime, reduce the fear of crime, and improve the quality of life. Built environment implementations of <br />CPTED seek to dissuade offenders from committing crimes by manipulating the built environment in which those <br />crimes proceed from or occur. The three most common built environment strategies are natural surveillance, natural <br />access control and natural territorial reinforcement. <br /> <br />Natural surveillance and access control strategies limit the opportunity for crime. Territorial reinforcement promotes <br />social control through a variety of measures. <br /> <br />Natural surveillance <br /> <br />Natural surveillance increases the threat of apprehension by taking steps to increase the perception that people can be <br />seen. Natural surveillance occurs by designing the placement of physical features, activities and people in such a way <br />as to maximize visibility and foster positive social interaction among legitimate users of private and public space. <br />Potential offenders feel increased scrutiny and limitations on their escape routes. <br /> <br />. Place windows overlooking sidewalks and parking lots. <br />. Leave window shades open. <br />. Use passing vehicular traffic as a surveillance asset. <br />