Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />Park & Recreation Committee Report to the City COUDelI on Nov. 9, 1988: <br /> <br />The following are the results of the Royal Meadows residents appearance at the <br />November P&R meeting regarding the Hardwood Ponds development park land <br />aquisition. The recently aquired park land is located in the northwest corner of the <br />development property and abutts the existing retaining pond. The intended use of the <br />park is to develop a turf trail approximately halfway down the slope, bctwCCll the <br />residents' property line and the pond edge. The trail would include entry points at Brian <br />Way. Royal Meadows Park and Ann Street No athletic facilities or play equipment are <br />included in the proposed plans. The park is to be brough to fine grade condition with a <br />minimum of 4" topsoil, seeded and straw mulched, if possible this fall, by the developer. <br />The land aquisition includes 80% of the possible land that could be aquired for park <br />dedication. <br /> <br />We anticipate the major park users will be the residents of Royal Meadows and Hardwood <br />Ponds. Along this trail they will be able to gain access to Royal Meadows Park and to the <br />park in the Centerville Heights development, as well as possible future parks in adjacent <br />proposed developments. In addition. this trail provides a link in a pedestrian system that <br />will allow children to travel to CCntervUle Elementary School without being exposed to <br />the dangers of the County roads. <br /> <br />The following are the issues of concern that the residents of Royal Meadows brought to <br />the attention of the Park and Recreation Committee at the November meeting: <br /> <br />1) Loss of privacy <br />2) Traffic <br />3) Garbage <br />4) ATVs and snowmobiles <br />S) Vandalism <br />6) Gravel path <br />7) Loss of nesting area for the water fowl <br />8) Flooding from runoff if the outlet is plugged <br />9) . Pond is not within the DNR jurisdiction <br />10) Child safety, kidnapping . <br />11) Liability .. <br />12) Kids/traffic disturbing waterfowl <br />13) MosqUito hole potential <br />14) Decreased value of adjacent homes <br />15) Increased access to water if cattails are removed = danger to kids <br />16) RM park is not big enough to serve 4 or S kids now, can't handle more kids <br />17) Increased Police calls <br />18) Don't want their kids to be able to go through the rest of the City <br />19) Quality of pond would improve if l' deeper than current level <br />20) Don't want to see people walking by <br /> <br />Suggestions from Royal Meadows residents (. indicates feasible in the short term): <br /> <br />1) Block entrance to the trails w. bollards. boulders, cable to prevent ATV. etc. traffic. <br />2) Tree line at property edge. widely spaced and pruned up to allow view and derme <br />property. . <br />3) Pond edge planting to discourage kids in pond and establish wildlife habitiat. <br />4) No gravel path. <br />S) Develop feeding statiODS <br />6) Minimum depth of pond to allow for ducks and cattails. <br />7) .Fence <br />