My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-02-04 Joint WS CC P & R Minutes Approved
Centerville
>
Committees
>
Parks & Rec.
>
Minutes
>
1985-2022
>
2009
>
2009-02-04 Joint WS CC P & R Minutes Approved
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2009 1:07:11 PM
Creation date
3/18/2009 1:07:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> Meeting Minutes 02-04-09 <br /> <br />JOINT WORK SESSION <br />CITY COUNCIL & PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE <br />MEETING MINUTES <br />Wednesday, February 4, 2009 - 6:30 p.m. <br /> <br />A Joint Work Session was held February 4, 2009 commencing at 6:30 p.m. between City Council and the Parks <br />& Recreation Committee. Mayor Capra and all Council Members were present, as well as Mr. Mark Statz, City <br />Engineer, Mr. Paul Palzer, Public Works Director, Mr. Dallas Larson, City Administrator and Ms. Kim <br />Stephan, Staff Liaison to the Parks & Recreation Committee. The Parks & Recreation members present were: <br />Chairperson Suzanne Seeley, Vice-Chairperson Kevin Amundsen, Committee Member Mark Haiden and <br />Committee Member Lori Harris. <br /> <br />DISCUSSON ITEMS: <br /> <br />Park Projects: System for managing and closing out Park Projects in conformance with expectations of <br />Parks & Recreation and City Council. <br /> <br />Chairperson Seeley began by saying the Parks & Recreation Committee has been disappointed and frustrated in <br />the outcome of the recent Park Projects and suggested the largest problem was communication among all parties <br />involved and perhaps lack of clarity as to what the expectations were for each project. <br /> <br />Mayor Capra asked for specific examples of how things could be handled differently. Committee Member <br />Harris, as the member most involved with the Tracie McBride Memorial Park renovations, spoke on the <br />problems with this particular park. Committee Member Harris prefaced her comments with she had not been to <br />a few Parks & Recreation Committee meetings at one point as she was frustrated and considered quitting after <br />seeing the outcome of the renovations to Tracie McBride Memorial Park. She was disappointed after the <br />committee had worked so hard on the planning that the outcome was not at all as intended. Committee Member <br />Harris said that the committee had specific goals, in writing, but plans were changed multiple times without <br />ever coming back to the Parks & Recreation Committee. There were problems with the contractor (sod, trails, <br />painting, and the window in the utility building), the vendor for the play ground equipment (installation of the <br />Merry-Go-Round) and the design being altered due to installation of additional drain tile. The contractor did <br />come back and reset the Merry-Go-Round, but neither with the first installation or the second adjustment did <br />they contact Public Works to say they were doing it, they just came and did it and left. Committee Member <br />Harris stated that if a committee member had been the contact person the problems would have been caught <br />right away. <br /> <br />Mr. Palzer said that the old existing play structure was actually two (2) feet lower than originally anticipated <br />and there were problems with drain tile. This issue resulted in extra costs which meant the project had to be cut <br />back elsewhere. Everyone agreed that the planning people are being left out of the loop as project changes <br />occur the decisions are being made by Mr. Larson, Mr. Palzer and Mr. Statz and not getting back to the <br />committee until the work is completed. Council Member Broussard asked the committee to consider whether <br />they were willing to have projects stopped and wait until the committee has their meeting once a month to be <br />able to make decisions. She also said she personally counts on Staff to make these decisions. Chairperson <br />Seeley suggested the committee does not necessarily have to have a formal meeting to review a project, if <br />something needs to change the Committee Project Manager can be contacted. If it is a simple decision that the <br />1 of 3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.