My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-04-01 P & R Packet
Centerville
>
Committees
>
Parks & Rec.
>
Agenda Packets
>
1997-2022
>
2009
>
2009-04-01 P & R Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/2/2009 1:47:10 PM
Creation date
3/27/2009 1:02:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
77
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />LED lamps vs. Other Lamps <br />Traditional lamps are radial light sources and are subject to fixture losses of 40 to 60 percent. <br />When light exits a lamp, much of it is moving away from the target. As the light reflects off the <br />insides of the fixture, much of it is lost and never makes it to the area that needs lighting. LEOS <br />emit light only in one direction, in a focused cone. It may produce half as much initially but the <br />amount of light that makes it to its intended area may be more than a traditional lamp with twice <br />the initial lumen rating. <br /> <br />A rating of 5000 lumens results in useful 'out of the fixture' rating around 2000 - 3000 lumens. <br />Sol LED light sources are directed light sources and are rated by their out of fixture lumens, all of <br />the fixture losses are all ready accounted for. <br /> <br />LED lights used in Sol's solar applications have a I OO,OOO-hour life and have minimal lumen <br />depreciation over the life of the lamp. This long life translates to reduced maintenance costs, <br />greater reliability, and a brighter lamp. <br /> <br />LEOs do not contain mercury, a disposal hazard. Sol LEOS will withstand shocks greater than 50- <br />G. There is nothing fragile in an LED. <br /> <br />LED lamps vs. Fluorescent (CFL) <br />Solar lights in the past have used compact fluorescent lamps (CFL). The fluorescent tube contains <br />a vapor that gives off ultraviolet light when ionized. The ultraviolet light makes particles that coat <br />the inside of the tube, and these particles glow or fluoresce. The life of a CFL is only 8-10,000 <br />hours or about 2.S years. In addition, the lumen output of a CFL will depreciate rapidly, making <br />the lamp permanently dimmer over the life of the lamp. <br /> <br />LEOS are the better choice, as it requires less maintenance and provides a long life. When a CFL <br />starts to burn out, it creates dark spots, which reduces the area illuminated. <br /> <br />CFL lamps contain mercury- a disposal hazard. <br /> <br />LED lamps vs. High Pressure Sodium (HPS) <br />IHPS lamps are more efficient than metal halide but are not a good choice when true color is <br />critical. The light output is an orange-gold color. HPS lamps are also not very efficient at low <br />wattages, unlike solar powered applications, which are more efficient. <br /> <br />The life rating of HPS lamp is another consideration. The average life for an HPS is 25,000 hours, <br />approximately one quarter of the life on an LED. When the HPS lamps fail, it fails completely, <br />whereas LEOS only get dimmer. The I OO,OOO-hour life of a LED is the point where the lamp has <br />lost 30% of its lumen maintenance. This long life translates to reduced maintenance costs, greater <br />reliability, and a brighter lamp. <br /> <br />Light color is measured using a color index (CRI) of I to I DO, with 100 representing sunlight. The <br />IESNA guideline recommends a CRI of 50 or higher. LEOS produce a white light with an excellent <br />CRI, which means you need less lumens to see color - how well you can see the color of a <br />fleeing suspect's clothes or hair. <br /> <br />12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.