Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />--. ~._._. """' <br /> <br />North Central has not met the financial qualifications <br />nor has North Central demonstrated it has the financial <br />qualifications sufficient to own and operate the cable <br />system. . . <br /> <br />5. Any of the foregoing Findings of Fact which might be <br />properly termed Conclusions are hereby adopted as such. <br /> <br />THIS REPORT IS NOT AN ORDER AND NO AUTHORITY IS GRANTED <br />~EREIN. THE MEMBER CITIES OF THE COMMISSION MUST ISSUE <br />A FINAL DETERMINATION WHICH MAY ADOPT OR DIFFER FROM THE <br />FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATION. <br /> <br />It is the recommendation.of the North Central Suburban <br />Cable Communications Commission II- to its Membertities that <br />it adopt the following: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION <br /> <br />IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED and based upon the Findings of <br />Fact and Conclusions of the North Central Suburban Cable <br />Communications Commission II ~attached hereto and made a <br />part hereof) that the City denies the request to transfer <br />the. ownership of and control of Group W Cable of the North <br />Central Suburbs, Inc. and transfer of the Cable Communica- <br />tions Franchise Ordinance to North Central Cable Communica- <br />tions L.P. . . . <br /> <br />The above listed Findings of Fact, Conclusions and <br />recommended resolution was moved by Commission Director <br />Meyer and duly seconded by Commission Director <br />Richmond <br /> <br />The following Commission Directors voted in the affirma- <br />tive: . <br /> <br />Kolessar, Gonsior, Nivala, Wurst, Johnson, Meyer, Richmond <br /> <br />The following Commission Directors voted in the nega- <br />tive: <br /> <br />None <br /> <br />- 7 "';" <br /> <br /> <br />..., <br /> <br />~"'" <br />