Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />tervi[[e <br />'Esta6[ished l1J57 <br /> <br />STAFF REPORT <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />February 27, 2002 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Mayor and City Council <br />Kim Moore-Sykes, City Administrator ~ <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />Amending the 2002 Fee Schedule <br /> <br />I........................................................................... <br /> <br />BACKGROUND <br />Staff is requesting two changes to the 2002 Fee Schedule Resolution. The first proposed <br />change is simply a change in the language regarding the Minimum Per Quarter fee under <br />Water Usalle Rates. Exhibit G. This is a fee that all City water customers are charged for <br />the maintenance of the water system. Several residents, especially those who are not <br />large users of water, have called thinking that we have double charged them. Staffis <br />proposing to change name to more accurately reflect that it is a fee rather than a <br />minimum charge. <br /> <br />The second proposed change is to add an escrow fee for final grading/sodding, as <br />descn'be in proposed revised language to Ordinance #4. In reviewing revisions to <br />Division 75: Final Gradinll and Landsca1;linll, Subd. 1, Staff found that there is a need to <br />amend the 2002 Fee Schedule to include an escrow fee for the proposed inclement <br />weather language that allows for the issuance of an occupancy pennit without the final <br />grading work being completed. This language was deemed necessary because of the <br />increasing number of winter sales and closings. <br /> <br />Based on the infonnation from the Building Inspector, the Public Works Director and the <br />City Attorney, Staff is proposing to set this escrow fee for final grading at $1,500. This <br />money will be refunded to the builder/contractor/property owner upon approval of the <br />final grading by the Building Inspector. This escrow is being established in order to <br />cover any financial exposure the City may have as the result of an incomplete or badly <br />done final grading. Once the Occupancy Permit is signed, the City loses its lever in <br />forcing compliance to the City's construction requirements. Holding this sum of money <br />in escrow simply insures that the job is done completely and correctly. Ifit is not, then <br />the City would have the escrowed funds to make repairs or complete the job. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />Approve Staff's propose changes to the 2002 Fee Schedule. <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />. <br />