My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-11-30 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2005
>
2005-11-30 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2006 2:37:51 PM
Creation date
11/23/2005 1:50:40 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
105
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />OVERVIEW <br /> <br />Minnesota Statutes S 1 69A.63 DUI forfeitures are civil in rem actions <br />against the instrumentality of what the legislature has classified as a <br />particularly serious DUI offense ("designated offense"). The cause of <br />action is not against the driver, but the vehicle. The vehicle does not <br />have to be used by its owner in committing the qualifying DUI for it to be <br />subject to forfeiture. The DUI offender does not have to be convicted of <br />the DUI for the vehicle to be forfeited, in some cases a sustained license <br />revocation is sufficient. Negotiation in the criminal case resulting in <br />conviction of a lesser degree of DUI offense is not always fatal to the <br />forfeiture. <br />A forfeiture action starts with law enforcement's seizure and <br />impoundment of the vehicle used to commit a designated offense and its <br />service of the notice required by S 1 69A.63, subd. 8 (b). It concludes <br />either upon: <br />1 .) <br /> <br />the filing of an Administrative Forfeiture Certificate upon <br />the expiration of the 30-day window for contest where no <br />claimant files a Demand; or <br />the filing of a certified court order denying or granting <br />forfeiture. <br />The basic elements of a successful forfeiture are: <br />1.) Was the vehicle used to commit a DUI offense? <br />2.) Did that DUI offense, as charged, qualify for forfeiture by <br />virtue of driver's license status or the presence of <br />aggravating factors? <br />If the vehicle owner was not the driver, did the owner know <br />or should have known that it be used by the operator in <br />violation of law so that it was incumbent on the owner to <br />take reasonable steps to prevent or terminate that illegal <br />use? <br />Was the operator either convicted of an 151 or 2nd degree <br />impaired driving offense or any impaired driving offense with <br />proof possible by a preponderance of the evidence of <br />qualifying aggravating factors or was there a qualified <br />sustained license revocation (arising out of the use of this <br />vehicle)? <br />Forfeiture actions valued at $7500 or less can be heard in <br />conciliation court at the option of the claimant - most forfeiture cases are <br />now litigated there. These cases can be removed or appealed to the <br />district court by either party. The claimant can also choose to file the <br />action in district court. There is no jury entitlement and most forfeitures are <br />capable of determination by summary judgment. These proceedings are <br />governed by the Rules of Civil Procedure. <br /> <br />2.) <br /> <br />3) <br /> <br />4) <br /> <br />While the forfeiture action is pending, the forfeiting agency, that is <br />the law enforcement agency making the arrest for designated offense. <br />(s 169A.63, subd. 1 (b ))has only a right to possess the vehicle and has a <br />duty to secure it and prevent waste. Should forfeiture be granted, the <br /> <br />21,2, <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.