My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-03-13 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2002
>
2002-03-13 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2009 8:07:45 AM
Creation date
4/21/2009 8:05:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
221
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />City of Centerville <br />February 27, 2002 <br />Council Minutes <br /> <br />Mr. Palzer indicated corner lots, in the previous ordinance, had two front yards and two <br />side yards but no rear yard. He then indicated the shed requirements were based on a <br />percentage of the rear yard but corner lots had no rear yard. He further indicated the <br />numbers in the ordinance clarify and address that type of situation. <br /> <br />Mr. Palzer indicated the Ordinance is hard to enforce when it conflicts upon itself and <br />Staff is not sure which requirement is the more stringent requirement. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she was not interested in going back to <br />Planning and Zoning on this Ordinance because that would further hold up the changes <br />and there are people waiting for the changes in order to proceed with their projects. She <br />then indicated that either she or Council Member Travis should be able to explain the <br />intent of Planning and Zoning with regard to questions Council may have. <br /> <br />Council Member Capra asked whether adding a provision concerning boats and docks <br />could be added to the Ordinance tonight without starting the process over. City Attorney <br />Hoeft indicated that making a substantive change to the Ordinance would mean starting <br />over. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers suggested holding that change to the next set of <br />amendments to the Ordinance. <br /> <br />, <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated Council could pass any portion of the Ordinance or none of <br />it but said that the issue of storage of boats and docks will not be an issue again until next <br />winter. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if there was a list of changes to the Ordinance. <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated a list was not provided to Council with the Ordinance <br />changes. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that, in the future, a master sheet would be <br />more helpful. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers askt:d if the amended date is the datc published or <br />the date voted on. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated that the City needed to decide which date to use and be <br />consistent. He then recommended using the effective date and noted the changes are <br />effective after the date of publishing. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers asked Staff to verify the effective dates on the <br />Ordinance. <br /> <br />Council Member Nelson indicated the first change is to allow nonconforming structures <br />for 12 months rather than 6 months. <br /> <br />Page 17 of 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.