My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-04-08 CC WS Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2002
>
2002-04-08 CC WS Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/21/2009 1:41:06 PM
Creation date
4/21/2009 1:40:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />To: Centerville City COlll1cil <br />City of Centerville <br /> <br />From: Richard DeFoe <br />Waterworks Beach Club <br /> <br />Thank-you lor taking the extra time needed to meet with the license holders of <br />Centerville. At the close of that meeting, you asked for our input regarding the liquor <br />ordinance. <br />As a license holder, I very much appreciate your willingness to review the <br />existing ordinance. I am in agreement with the representatives f)'om the state licensing <br />board tMr. Erickson <Uld Mr. McManus) who advised us to concentrate on the problem <br />that brought everyone to the meeting in the first place. <br />An effective solution may be to draft a clarification letter to be attached to all <br />license applications when they are mailed out to perspective licensees. This would be an <br />inexpensive way to clear up any misunderstanding about the application process and <br />could include the deadline for accepting applications and thc date of the council meeting <br />lor considering the application. <br />As far as adopting a new liquor license ordinance, I am in favor 0 f no action at <br />this time, for the following reasons: <br /> <br />I) The current ordinance gives the city council substantial leeway when dealing with <br />license-holders. I think the current system promotes healthy commlmication <br />bctwecn the existing council and its license holders. The city also enjoys the <br />ability to be as harsh as necessary when dealing with violations. I think this is an <br />enormous advantage lor the city. <br /> <br />2) There seem to bc many issues that may be higher on the council's agenda <md a <br />more appropJiate use of funds at this time. <br /> <br />In closing, I wOLlld again like to thank the city for taking time to include the license <br />holders in this process. I hope that the above suggestion will provide an effective <br />solution, while using a minimal amount of the city's time, encrgy and tax dollars. <br /> <br />Respecttitlly, <br /> <br />c"~~ vLiJ t:L ~ <br /> <br />Richm'd DeFoe <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.