My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-04-14 CC
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
2004-04-14 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2006 2:43:52 PM
Creation date
11/23/2005 2:54:47 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />April 14, 2004 <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers asked whether they could go into executive session. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft stated there was nothing to go to executive session for. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar stated since they were looking for public works employees that the <br />Public Works Director should have been the one to go through the intitial criteria on the <br />applications. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft stated if they were going to go through the process again and use <br />different criteria, then they needed to apply the criteria to all 50 applicants and interview <br />the applicants who now met the criteria. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Capra , seconded by Council Member Lee, to table the <br />issue until the next Council meeting. All in favor. Three in favor, and two opposed <br />(Sweeney & Broussard Vickers). Motion carried. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Lee, seconded by Council Member Capra, to have Ms. <br />Moore-Sykes and Paul Palzer, Public Works Dept., work together to create criteria <br />to review all 50 candidates to ensure that they are not missing the very best <br />candidate. All in favor. Three in favor, and two opposed (Sweeney & Broussard <br />Vickers). Motion carried. <br /> <br /> <br />8.Ordinance #52 – Recommended Language Amendments <br /> <br />There was a discussion regarding after the ordinance is passed, it will be published. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Capra, seconded by Council Member Lee, to adopt <br />Ordinance #52, Recommended Language Amendments. All in favor. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br /> <br /> <br />9.Predatory Offender Notification <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft explained that the police department is already required to release <br />information on sex offenders being released. He explained the statutes provide immunity <br />to cities if they don’t provide any information, but that the city could be liable if they <br />provide information which they are not supposed to. <br /> <br />Council Member Lee stated it was his position that the City notify all the residents in the <br />community. <br /> <br />The Council discussed the item. <br /> <br />Council Member Capra suggested notifying residents to check the city’s web site for the <br />information in order to not be held liable for disseminating incorrect information. City <br />Page 9 of 11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.