Laserfiche WebLink
City of Centerville <br />July 28, 2004 <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />Council asked Staff to work on the document and discuss the issues <br /> <br />IX. ANNOUNCEMENTS/UPDATES <br /> <br />1. 2004 Street Project <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson provided an update on the 2004 street project and said the projects are going <br />well. He then said that another crew was brought into Shad Avenue to attempt to bring <br />them back on schedule. He further indicated that the developer will not allow the City <br />onto Ground Development property so an alternate route is necessary. <br /> <br />The Council discussed the matter with the City Engineer and City Attorney and the City <br />Engineer recommended an alternate route that would cost approximately $10,000 more. <br />Mr. Peterson recommended delaying the assessment to them until water is run down that <br />street. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that she wants residents informed that they <br />will be assessed for storm sewer and water. <br /> <br />Council Member Capra asked whether the residents would have due process if they are <br />not noticed now. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated that they would still have the opportunity to comment at <br />the public hearing when water is proposed. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers asked if the pond has the capacity to handle the extra <br />flow. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson indicated it would be dredged this winter and should have the capacity and <br />the water currently flows to that location. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Capra, seconded by Council Member Paar to approve <br />the alternative change order as recommended by the City Engineer. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar indicated that he wanted it to note precisely that these residents are <br />to be assessed for storm sewer not now but they will be assessed to the eastern half of <br />Center Street when water is run down that street. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that the residents would be assessed the <br />$10,000 cost for running the pipe rather than the $35,000 split amongst the benefiting <br />homeowners. <br /> <br />VOTE: All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Council Member Capra asked when the sod would be going down. <br />Page 9 of 10 <br /> <br />