My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-09-08 CC
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
2004-09-08 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2006 2:43:33 PM
Creation date
11/23/2005 2:57:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />September 8, 2004 <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated that he could not recommend approval of the requested lot <br />split for the Carpenter property because it creates a nonconforming lot and there is no <br />proposal to combine it with an existing piece of property. <br /> <br />Mr. Shudy indicated that there should be a proposal in the near future. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated that he understands that this is a situation that the City <br />would like to have cleared up but this is not the way to do it. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Capra, seconded by Council Member Paar to continue <br />the public hearing on the Carpenter lot split. All in favor. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />th <br />8. Mr. Ray Olson, 6805 – 20 Avenue South Special Use Permit <br /> <br />Mayor Sweeney opened the public hearing at 7:44 p.m. <br /> <br />Mr. Ray Olson addressed Council and explained his request for a special use permit <br />noting that he started the operation with 24 trailers, is down to 16, and intends to be down <br />to 12 by January 1, 2005. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated that the property can be treated as industrial as that is and <br />has been the use and the Comprehensive Plan issues can be handled separately. He then <br />asked whether Planning and Zoning discussed and made a recommendation as to the <br />performance standards to be required under the special use permit. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers commented that Mr. Rehbein was to have hooked up <br />to sanitary sewer and has not done that. She then asked whether that could be a <br />requirement under the special use permit. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated that would be handled as a separate matter. <br /> <br />Council discussed the matter and agreed that the use is and has been there and should be <br />allowed to continue under a special use permit. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Capra, seconded by Council Member Paar to close the <br />public hearing. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded by Council Member Paar <br />to grant a special use permit to allow the existing use to continue without any <br />additional requirements until June 1, 2005. All in favor. Motion carried <br />unanimously. <br /> <br />Mr. Koran asked Council whether his property would be rezoned and how that would <br />happen. Council informed him that the City would initiate a petition for rezoning all the <br />properties in that area to bring them into conformity with the Ordinance. <br /> <br />Page 6 of 10 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.