My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-05-22 WS Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2002
>
2002-05-22 WS Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2009 7:59:01 AM
Creation date
5/12/2009 7:58:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
86
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />.~ , <br /> <br /> <br />City of Centerville <br />March 29, 2002 <br />Page Four <br /> <br />Fund balance should be maintained for the following reasons: <br /> <br />Purposes and Benefits <br /> <br />. Expenditures are incurred somewhat evenly throughout the year. However, property tax and state aid revenues are not <br />received until the second half of the year. An adequate fund balance will provide the cash flow required to finance the <br />General Fund expenditures. Your fund balance appears to be sufficient to provide this working capitaL <br /> <br />. The City is vulnerable to legislative actions at the State and Federal level. The State eliminated HACA aid with the <br />2001 legislative session. Levy limits have also been implemented for municipalities in past legislative sessions. An <br />adequate fund balance will provide a temporary buffer against those aid adjustments and levy limits <br /> <br />. Expenditures not anticipated at the time the annual budget was adopted may need immediate Council action. These <br />would include capital outlay replacement, lawsuits and other items. An adequate fund balance will provide the <br />financing needed for such expenditures. <br /> <br />. A strong fund balance will assist the City in maintaining or improving its bond rating. <br /> <br />A summary of the 200 I operations is as follows: <br /> <br />Budget <br /> <br />Actual <br /> <br />Variance - <br />Favorable <br />(Unfavorable) <br /> <br />Revenue $ 1,654,582 $ 1,790,729 $ 136,377 <br />Expenditures 1.532.352 1.929.024 (396.672 ) <br />Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenditures 122.000 (138.295 ) (260.295 ) <br />Other financing sources (uses) <br />Operating transfers in 68,034 68,034 <br />Operating transfers out (122.000) !122.0oo ) <br />Excess (deficiency) of revenue and other financing sources <br />over expenditures and other financing uses $ (192,261) $ (]92 261) <br />Fund Balance, January I 841.154 <br />Fund Balance, December 31 $ 648 893 <br /> <br />. The majority of the favorable revenue variance resulted from licenses and permits in excess of budget by $83,438. <br /> <br />. Interest income was $55,908 under budget. Even with a 5 percent rate of return the budget would be too high. Interest <br />rates were around 3 percent to 5 percent at the beginning of the year and 1.5 percent to 3 percent at the end of the year. <br />The City needs to consider its current cash balance when setting the budget for interest. <br /> <br />. The majority of the unfavorable expenditure variance resulted from capital outlay in excess of budget by $290,223. <br /> <br />. The City does not budget for the Fire aid revenue and subsequent payment to the relief association. The payment to the <br />Relief was $100,393 and accounted for over 25 percent of the expenditure variance. We recommend the Fire aid and <br />payment be reflected in the budget. <br /> <br />L_ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.