My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-04-08 WS Meeting
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2002
>
2002-04-08 WS Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/12/2009 8:31:09 AM
Creation date
5/12/2009 8:30:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />To: Centerville City Council <br />City of Centerville <br /> <br />From: Richard DeFoe <br />Waterworks Beach Club <br /> <br />Thilllk-you lor taking the extra time needed to meet with the license holders of <br />Centcrville. At the close of that meeting, you asked lor our input regarding the liquor <br />ordinilllce. <br />As a license holder, I very much appreciate your willingness to review the <br />existing ordinilllce. I am in agreement with the representatives Ii-mn the state licensing <br />board (Mr. Erickson illld Mr. McManus) who advised us to concentrate on the problem <br />that brought everyone to the meeting in the first place. <br />An efTective solution may be to draft a clarification letter to be attached to all <br />license applications when tJley are mailed out to perspective licensees. This would be an <br />inexpensive way to clear up illlY mislll1derstanding about the application process and <br />could include the deadline for accepting applications and the date of the cOlmciI meeting <br />for considering the application. <br />As far as adopting a new liquor license ordinance, I illn in favor of no action at <br />this time, for the following reasons: <br /> <br />1) The currcnt ordinance gives the city council substillltialleeway when dealing with <br />license-holders. r think the cun'ent system promotes healthy eommlll1ication <br />between the existing council ,md its license holders. The city also enjoys the <br />ability to be as harsh as necessary when dealing with violations. I think this is illl <br />enonnous advillltage for the city. <br /> <br />2) There seem to be milllY issues that m,lY be higher on the council's agenda and a <br />more appropriate use of funds at this time. <br /> <br />[n closing, I would again like to thank the city tor taking time to include the license <br />[wluers iulhis process. I hope that the above suggestion will provide an ctTcctive <br />solution, while using a minimal runOlll1t of the city's time, energy illld tax dollars, <br /> <br />Respectfully, <br /> <br />'._~~ vLl? {J~- <br /> <br />Richm-d DePoe <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.