Laserfiche WebLink
<br />... . <br /> <br />Retentioft-Svstems <br />-werponas <br /> <br />Description (continued) <br /> <br />although some infiltration can occur (depending on groundwater depth and soil type), as well as evaporation in <br />summer months. <br /> <br />Wet ponds work best when the water already in the pond is moved out en masse by incoming flows, a phenomena <br />called "plug flow." Because treatment works on this displacement principle, the permanent pool of wet ponds may <br />be provided below the groundwater level without interfering unduly with treatment effectiveness. Local authori- <br />ties' regulations concerning groundwater should be consulted before constructing such a wet pond, however. <br /> <br />Removal efficiency is primarily dependent on the length of time that runoff remains in the pond, which is known as <br />the pond's Hydraulic Residence Time (HRT). As discussed above, wet ponds can remove pollutants not only <br />through sedimentation but also through biological uptake processes, whose removal of pollutants is proportional to <br />the length oftime runoff remains in the pond. <br /> <br />Studies have shown that more than 90 percent of the pollutant removal occurs during the quiescent period (the <br />period between the rainfall events) (MD DEQ, 1986). However, some removal occurs during the dynamic period <br />(when the runoff enters the pond). Modeling results have indicated that two-thirds ofthe sediment, nutrients and <br />trace metal loads are removed by sedimentation within 24 hours. These projections are supported by the results of <br />the EPA's 1993 Nationwide Urban Runoff Program (NURP) studies. However, other studies indicate that an HRT <br />of two weeks is required to achieve significant phosphorus removal (MD DEQ, 1986). Researchers have devel- <br />oped design guidelines (discussed below) that are based in part on the influence ofthe HRT on a wet pond's <br />treatment efficiency. <br /> <br />When properly designed and maintained, a wet pond can add recreation, open space, fire protection and <br />aesthetic values to a project area. <br /> <br />Enhancement Options <br /> <br />Following the recommendations of this BMP section, by providing deep inlet and outlet zones or multiple pools, will <br />usually result in designs that are robust enough to handle the winter and spring conditions without special consider- <br />ations. However, runoff volume from spring snowmelt events can be very large, often the largest-volu,me event of <br />the year. Ponds designed to function effectively in summer are often disrupted by winter and spring events. <br />Inspection and maintenance during spring runoff should be a consistent feature of stormwater treatment systems in <br />cold climates. <br /> <br />There are several common modifications that can be made to a wet pond to increase its pollutant removal effec- <br />tiveness. These options are described below. <br /> <br />Varied Depths Throughout the Permanent Pool <br /> <br />Intermittent benches around the perimeter of the pond are recommended for safety and to promote vegetation. <br />The safety bench should be designed to be at least 10 feet wide and located above normal pool elevations. The <br />aquatic bench should be a minimum often feet wide and depths of6-18 inches should be maintained at normal <br />elevations to support aquatic vegetation. Deeper depths near the outlet will yield cooler bottom water discharges <br />that may mitigate downstream thermal effects during the summer. Figure 2 shows a wet pond with both safety <br />and aquatic benches. <br /> <br />3-252 <br /> <br />Minnesota Urban Small Sites BMP Manual <br /> <br />l_ __ <br />