Laserfiche WebLink
<br />""-' <br /> <br />," . <br /> <br /> <br />LMC <br /> <br />LMCIT <br />Risk Management Information <br /> <br />~ o{Minow.o/4 em.. <br />Cities promoting ~Cll <br /> <br />145 University AVem1e West, St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 <br />Phone: (651) 281.1200 . (800) 925-1122 <br />Fax, (651) 281-1298 . roD (651) 281-1290 <br />www.1Illcit.lmnc.org <br /> <br />TECHNOLOGY AND THE INTERNET: <br />LIABILITY ISSUES FOR CITIES <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />Cities may face new areas ofliability as a result of the increasing use of technology and the <br />Internet in the workplace. Legal precedents in these areas are still evolving. However, there are <br />several issues cities should consider. Cities can address these issues and reduce the risk of <br />liability by adopting a policy relating to employee use of technology and the Internet. If a policy <br />is adopted, it should be distributed to employees. Employees should sign and return a form <br />acknowledging receipt of the policy (sample in Appendix). <br /> <br />The following material highlights some of the liability issues that cities should consider and <br />contains suggestions for statements that cities may want to include in a policy for employee use <br />of technology and the Internet. The Appendix contains several sample forms and policies that <br />may contain provisions that could serve as models in drafting a policy for your city. This <br />material is not intended to provide legal advice. You should have your city attorney review any <br />proposed policy before final council action to make sure that it fits the needs of your city and <br />complies with current statutes, regulations and court decisions. <br /> <br />A. Employer monitoring <br /> <br />There are several reasons why employers may want to monitor employee use of technology and <br />the Internet. For example, employers may be concerned about employee productivity or the <br />liability that might result from improper use of these tools. Advancements in technology have <br />provided employers with the capability to monitor employee use of technology and the Internet. <br />For example, Internet access programs permit network operators to track the Internet sites visited <br />by employees, the amount of time spent at each site and whether images and documents were <br />printed or downloaded. A city that is considering whether to monitor its employees should be <br />aware of the possible liability associated with this activity. There are three possible claims that <br />employees could make against a city that monitors employee use of technology and the Internet. <br /> <br />I. Unreasonable search under the 41h Amendment <br />City employees may be able to claim protection for their e-mail communications, <br />computer files and use of the Internet under the 4th Amendment to the United States <br />Constitution. If city employees can show that they have a reasonable expectation of <br />privacy in these areas, they may be able to successfully argne that employer monitoring <br />in certain circumstances is an unreasonable search. <br />