Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br />~ ~ <br /> <br />Best Practices Review Summary #02-09a <br /> <br />---, <br /> <br />rtJlIPI <br /> <br />OFFICE OF THE LEGISLATIVE AUDITOR <br />STATE OF MiNNESOTA <br /> <br />Managing Local Government <br />Computer Systems: <br />A Best Practices Review <br />April 30, 2002 <br /> <br />Local governments may manage their <br />computer systems in-house, by <br />outside vendors, by an intergovernmental <br />computer collaboration, or by a <br />combination of these three approaches. <br />This report recommends that counties, <br />cities, and school <br />districts adopt certain <br />best practices as they <br />consider how they want <br />to manage their computer <br />systems. <br /> <br /> <br />Local <br />governments <br />should evaluate <br />how well each <br />option for <br />managing <br />computers <br />addressl:S <br />security, stafimg, <br />and control <br />policies. <br /> <br />Recommended <br />Best Practices: <br /> <br />. Before deciding how <br />to manage their <br />computer systems, <br />local governments should make sure <br />that: information technology has the <br />support of top officials, staff have the <br />capacity to estimate total costs and <br />manage contracts, jurisdictions <br />identify the services that should be <br />automated, staff plan for computer <br />system replacements, and <br />jurisdictions know where information <br />technology fits within their <br />organizations. <br /> <br />. Local governments should judge a <br />management option based on whether <br />it has complete inventories of <br />equipment, sets standards for <br />computer hardware and software, <br />follows a clearly documented <br />program to control the day-to-day <br />operations of the computer system, <br />communicates computer system <br />policies and procedures to people <br /> <br />using the system, and monitors <br />co,?pliance with the policies. <br /> <br />. Local governments should also. ensure <br />that the computer systems are <br />managed by staff who have sufficient <br />expertise, receive ongoing training, <br />and provide training and support to <br />computer users. <br /> <br />. Finally, local governments should <br />look for management options that use <br />trained professionals to assess the <br />computer system's security risks, <br />develop security policies based on the <br />risks, manage user accounts and <br />employee access to the system, install <br />and mouitor firewalls and antivirus <br />software, develop backup procedures <br />and disaster recovery plans, and test <br />security procedures. <br /> <br />In addition to these recommendations, the <br />review found that: <br /> <br />. All of Minnesota's counties, school <br />districts, and large cities use personal <br />computers and have computer <br />networks, but 27 percent of cities <br />with 500 or fewer residents do not use <br />any personal computers. <br /> <br />. Nearly all of Minnesota's local <br />governments use their own staff to <br />manage some part of their computer <br />systems, but most also rely on <br />computer vendors or <br />intergovernmental computer <br />collaborations to maintain parts of <br />their hardware or to support software <br />applications. <br /> <br />Room 140,658 Cedar Stred, 51. Paul, MN 55155 -- Telephone: 651-2964708 -. Fax: 651.296-4712 -. E.mail: anditor.state.mn.us <br /> <br />L____ <br />