Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br /> <br />'Esta6[islied 18S7 <br /> <br />STAFF REPORT <br /> <br />DATE: <br /> <br />September 16, 2002 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />Honorable Mayor and City Council <br /> <br /> <br />Kim Moore-Sykes, City Administrator fWb <br /> <br /> <br />Tri-City Meeting at Hugo on September 12, 2002 <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />............................................................................ <br /> <br />This second Tri-City meeting was very informative and productive, although the group <br />agreed to table the question of sharing water production (number 4. on the meeting <br />agenda) at Mayor Miron's request. He suggested that it should be rescheduled to the next <br />meeting due to the extensive discussion that had been going on regarding the CSAH <br />8/ll4lmprovement Project and the I35E/CSAH 14 Interchange. <br /> <br />Several of the area's political representatives were also in attendance. Kennedy, <br />Vanderveer, Krentz, Bachmann, Holston and others that I did not know were there mostly <br />for the discussions regarding the widening of 14 and the interchange. Lynn Bly, State of <br />Minnesota, discussed some of the benefits of moving the interchange to the south. She <br />also stated that there will be a meeting Sept. 17 from 4:30 to 7:00 at the Century Junior <br />High School in Forest Lake. <br /> <br />Glen Van Wormer, SEH and formally from MnDOT, discussed the 1995 transportation <br />study that was commissioned by the I35E Corridor Coalition. The Coalition included <br />White Bear Lake, White Bear Township, Vadnais Heights, Gem Lake, North Oaks, <br />Ramsey County, Met Council, and MnDOT. Mr. Van Wormer indicated that these cities <br />were experiencing a similar situation as Centerville, Hugo and Lino Lakes with increased <br />traffic and increasing growth. He reported that they looked at the relationship between <br />land use and transportation and worked towards balancing them. He indicated that <br />coordination between the interested parties was critical to the success of their project and <br />part of this coordination was the agreement each made to keep land use planning <br />activities to what was stated in each comprehensive land use plan. He kept reiterating <br />that it is important to find a balance between land development and roadway capacity and <br />with good, sound plans, he felt the group had the strength to meet and overcome legal <br />challenges from developers. This same cohesiveness is just as important when <br />approaching the State or Federal governments for funding. Kennedy and Vandeveer <br />repeated this idea as well; they both said that regional planning gets more attention from <br />funding sources that a broader coalition is more likely to succeed in getting financial <br />support for a regional project that benefits more people. <br />