My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-08-28 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2002
>
2002-08-28 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2009 8:15:43 AM
Creation date
5/13/2009 8:14:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Centerville <br />August] 4,2002 <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />2, AT&T (Capra) <br /> <br />Council Member Capra indicated that the Commission is looking at approval of the <br />contract at the August 21, 2002 meeting, She then indicated that she would be given a <br />synopsis ofthe contract and could provide that to CounciL <br /> <br />3, 1540 Peltier Lake Drive <br /> <br />This item was handled earlier in the meeting, <br /> <br />4, Commercial Developments Inquiry/Capital Proiects Analvsis <br /> <br />Ms, Moore-Sykes indicated that Staff continues to research the capital projects, <br /> <br />Ms, Paulseth indicated that she is having trouble finding the developer's agreement for <br />Apple Tree Square, <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated that often times the prior City Administrator drafted the <br />agreements in house and if that was the case he may not have a copy at his office but said <br />he would look, <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers said she would like to have the developers billed out <br />if the developer's agreements can be found, Ms, Paulseth indicated she and Ms, Moore- <br />Sykes have had discussions about this with some ofthe developers and there are concerns <br />with the timeliness of the billing. <br /> <br />Ms, Paulseth indicated that the developers have been given itemized copies of the billings <br />that occurred over the years. <br /> <br />Council Member Capra asked if Council should set a timeframe for response or payment <br />on the accounts, <br /> <br />Council Member Nelson suggested 30 days, <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated that it would be necessary to determine when the statute of <br />limitations began running before giving a time frame for payment. Ms, Paulseth <br />indicated that Deer Pass was closed out. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers asked Staff to determine the statute oflimitations of <br />the accounts that were closed out <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated that any continuing obligations on the part of the developer <br />would extend the contract He then said he would review the contracts to determine the <br />statute of limitations, <br /> <br />Page 20 of21 <br /> <br />, <br />-------------- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.