My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-08-28 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2002
>
2002-08-28 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2009 8:15:43 AM
Creation date
5/13/2009 8:14:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
129
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Centerville <br />August 14, 2002 <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />Mr. patzer indicated he had gone over the numbers and met with Mr. Runkle and is <br />satisfied with them. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft noted that 150% of the retainage amount would be required with this <br />contract as it was with Phase 1. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated that the figure on Page 5 for improvements is $462,881.05. <br />Mr. Palzer indicated that number was obtained from the contract for the improvements. <br />Mr. Runkle indicated the number was from the bids and is correct. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated that Mr. Runkle has said that the principal of Ground <br />Development will execute the waiver of objection and right of appeal to that doIlar <br />amount as soon as he is available. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated the park dedication fee had been calculated to be $54,000 <br />and the storm water fee is $13,058. Mr. Palzer indicated he had generated the figure for <br />the storm water fee. <br /> <br />Mr. Runkle indicated he was trying to verify that number but thinks it should be real <br />close. City Attorney Hoeft explained that the storm water fee is not negotiable. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated the liability insurance requirements have not changed. <br /> <br />Council Member Capra asked if the driveways were in the agreement. Council Member <br />Travis indicated that the driveways are in there. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft indicated that the agreement requires the developer to comply with <br />whatever erosion control methods the City requires. <br /> <br />Council Member Capra said she thought there was to be two feet of sod. Council <br />Member Travis indicated the sod would not grow as there would not be anyone to <br />maintain it. Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that there would be silt fencing and a gravel <br />driveway for each lot. <br /> <br />Motion bv Council Member Travis. seconded bv Council Member Nelson to <br />annrove the develonment contract for Pheasant Marsh Phase II continl!:ent uoon the <br />develooer sil!:nlnl!: an aueement of assessment and waiver of irrel!:Ularitv and anoeal <br />for the amount of 5462.881.05 and the verification of the storm water fee <br />calculation. <br /> <br />Council Member Capra commented that the agreement received bye-mail was different <br />than what was received tonight. City Attorney Hoeft indicated there was more <br />information in the one provided at the meeting. <br /> <br />VOTE: Aves - 4. Navs - O. Abstaiu -ICBroussard Vickers). Motion carried. <br /> <br />Page 70f21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.