My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-08-14 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2025
>
2002
>
2002-08-14 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2009 9:02:51 AM
Creation date
5/13/2009 8:58:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
237
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />LMC <br /> <br />145 University Avenue West, St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 <br />phone: (651) 281-1200 . (800) 925-1122 <br />TDD (651) 281-1290 <br />LMe Fax: (651) 281-1299 . LMCIT Fax: (651) 281-1298 <br />Weh Site: http://www.1mnc.org <br /> <br />League of Minnesota Cities <br />Cities promoting e#CGUence <br /> <br />August 1, 2002 <br /> <br />TO: <br /> <br />City Managers, Administrators, and Clerks <br /> <br />FROM: <br /> <br />Tom Grundhoefer, LMC General Counsel <br /> <br />RE: <br /> <br />Issues arising out of July 17,2002 State Auditor Investigative Report <br />to the City of Brooklyn Park <br /> <br />Introduction <br /> <br />The Office of the State Auditor (OSA) recently issued a report "questioning" various <br />spending practices of the City of Brooklyn Park. Since the report was issued, the League <br />has had a number of calls from city officials asking our reaction to some of the issues <br />discussed in the report. It is our sense that some of the practices addressed by the OSA <br />may be common in other cities. Accordingly, we thought it might be helpful for the <br />League to put in writing some of our thoughts regarding certain issued addressed by the <br />OSA. <br /> <br />At the outset, we want to make clear that this memo does not deal with all of the matters <br />raised by the OSA, nor should it be taken as an encouragement or a recommendation by <br />the League to disregard the observations made by the OSA. As always, decisions about <br />city spending policies and practices are largely a matter of local concern and ought to be <br />thoughtfully discussed and analyzed at the city councilleve!. In addition, because many <br />of the issues fall into what might be considered the "gray area," we encourage you to <br />consult with your city attorney about this topic. <br /> <br />Background <br /> <br />As an initial matter, it may be useful to make a comment on the legal effect of the <br />auditor's opinion on Brooklyn Park and other cities. Under Minn. Stat. SS 6.49 and 6.50, <br />the OSA has the responsibility to supervise the financial accounts of Minnesota cities and <br />to conduct an examination of city accounts and records as the "State Auditor may deem <br />the public interest to demand." Pursuant to these powers, the OSA investigated <br />complaints about Brooklyn Park's expenditure practices, and issued a report finding that <br />a number of the city's expenditures were "questionable." As it stands, the report is an <br /> <br />AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY! AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.