Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The Attorney General's Opinion goes on to say that the "inquiry should focus on the <br />questions of whether the primary purpose of the luncheon was in fact to discuss planning <br />and operations of the new branch library, and whether that discussion is properly <br />incidental to the Library Board's chartered function." The Opinion states, "Our courts <br />are disposed to defer decision on these questions unless the facts show a serious abuse of <br />discretion. " <br /> <br />In commenting on a 1954 Opinion addressing luncheon expenses incurred by the City of <br />Hopkins, the Attorney General stated, <br /> <br />"it rests within the discretion of the city council, in the exercise of its sound and <br />honest judgment, to determine whether or not the above $10.00 item was incurred <br />for a public purpose. . ." <br /> <br />Moreover, in another opinion from 1958, regarding the reimbursement of expenses in <br />attending a convention, the Attorney General stated: <br /> <br />"Matters of this kind involve questions of fact and of policy. Our courts have <br />indicated it is wisest to leave such matters to the reasonable discretion of those <br />who represent the interest of the city, i.e., its governing body." <br /> <br />Accordingly, as with many ofthe other issues addressed by the OSA, the question of the <br />validity of business luncheon expenses incurred by city officials is one for the city <br />council to evaluate, looking at whether the expense furthers a public purpose and whether <br />it can logically be seen as a natural incident of a municipal function. In this regard, we <br />would urge cities to set policies and establish guidelines describing under what <br />circumstance the city will reimburse for employee lunches. <br /> <br />Chamber of Commerce Dues <br /> <br />Relying on a 1997 Attorney General letter Opinion to the City of Staples, the OSA <br />questioned the legality of paying dues to the local Chamber of Commerce. The Attorney <br />General's Opinion, upon which the OSA relies, offers a very narrow interpretation of <br />three statutes that arguably support authority to pay chamber dues. <br /> <br />In particular, Minn. Stat. ~ 469.187 - ~ 469. I 89 gives various categories of cities, the <br />authority to expend city funds to advertise the "resources and advantages" of the <br />community. While there is no explicit statutory authority to pay dues to a Chamber of <br />Commerce, it can be argued that the purpose of a Chamber of Commerce is to promote <br />the city's resources and advantages. In effect, the membership in the Chamber of <br />Commerce could be viewed as a contract between the city and the chamber to promote <br />the city. To buttress this argument, at the time of approving chamber membership, the <br />city council may want to make explicit findings about what it intends to receive from its <br />chamber membership and why participation in the chamber promotes an important city <br />purpose. <br /> <br />7 <br />