My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-08-12 CC Worksession
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2002
>
2002-08-12 CC Worksession
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2009 9:08:12 AM
Creation date
5/13/2009 9:06:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />.. <br /> <br /> <br />City of Centerville <br />March 29, 2002 <br />Page Four <br /> <br />Fund balance should be maintained for the following reasons: <br /> <br />Purposes and Benefits <br /> <br />Expenditures are incurred somewhat eveuly throughout the year. However, property tax and state aid revenues are not <br />received until the second half of the year. An adequate fund balance will provide the cash flow required to fmance the <br />General Fund expenditures. Your fund balance appears to be sufficient to provide this working capital. <br /> <br />The City is vulnerable to legislative actions at the State and Federal level. The State eliminated RACA aid with the <br />2001 legislative session. Levy limits have also been implemented for municipalities in past legislative sessions. An <br />adequate fund balance will provide a temporary buffer against those aid adjustments and levy limits <br /> <br />Expenditures not anticipated at the time the anoual budget was adopted may need immediate Council action. These <br />would include capital outlay replacement, lawsuits and other items. An adequate fund balance will provide the <br />fmancing needed for such expenditures. <br /> <br />A strong fund balance will assist the City in maintaining or improving its bond rating. <br /> <br /> <br />A sunnnary of the 200 I operations is as follows: <br /> <br />Budget <br /> <br />Actual <br /> <br />Variance - <br />Favorable <br />(Unfavorable) <br /> <br />Revenue $ 1,654,582 $ 1,790,729 $ 136,377 <br />Expenditures 1.532.352 1.974.028 (441.626) <br />Excess (deficiency) of revenue over expenditures 122.000 (\ 83.299) (305.299) <br />Other financing sources (uses) <br />Operating transfers in 177 ,225 177,225 <br />Operating transfers out (\ 22.000) (122.000) <br />Excess (deficiency) of revenue and other fmancing sources <br />over expenditures and other fmancing uses $ (\28,074) $ (]28 074) <br />Fund Balance, January 1 841.154 <br />Fund Balance, December 31 $ 713 080 <br /> <br />o The majority of the favorable revenue variance resulted from licenses and permits in excess of budget by $83,438. <br /> <br />o Interest income was $55,908 under budget. Even with a 5 percent rate of return the budget would be too high. Interest <br />rates were around 3 percent to 5 percent at the beginning of the year and 1.5 percent to 3 percent at the end of the year. <br />The City needs to consider its current cash balance when setting the budget for interest. <br /> <br />o The majority of the unfavorable expenditure variance resulted from capital outlay in excess of budget by $290,223. A <br />portion of this variance was funded with a $109,191 transfer from the Park fund. <br /> <br />o The City does not budget for the Fire aid revenue and subsequent payment to the relief association. The payment to the <br />Reliefwas $100,393 and accounted for over 25 percent of the expenditure variance. We recommend the Fire aid and <br />payment be rellected in the budget. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.