My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2002-11-27 CC Packet
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2002
>
2002-11-27 CC Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/13/2009 9:36:40 AM
Creation date
5/13/2009 9:34:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
213
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Centerville <br />November 13,2002 <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />when homes are put there they will not be in water or one foot away from water shortly <br />thereafter, <br /> <br />Mayor Swedberg indicated there are good reasons to loop the water but he thinks the <br />developer should pay for the entire thing, <br /> <br />Motion bv Mavor Swedbere:. seconded bv Council Member Nelson to continue the <br />rezone and preliminary plat to the next Council Meetine: for further information <br />and discussion. <br /> <br />Mr. John Buckbee, 7381 Peltier Circle, indicated that the assessments have no bearing on <br />the rezoning, He then said that they applied back in September and there was a series of <br />delays and the information in front of Council has been with Council for some time. He <br />further commented that he is concerned with putting this off because it is already past the <br />60 days and the City added another 60 days. <br /> <br />My. Buckbee explained that the P-l property was purchased from the St Paul Water <br />Utility and is no longer public property and, as a matter of housekeeping, should be <br />rezoned, He then explained that City Attorney Hoeft had given an opinion that C-I is not <br />a legal zoning and was put in 'at one time as a vision for trails. He further commented <br />that he is asking that the property be rezoned to R-2 and noted that, at one time, it was all <br />zoned R-l other than the land purchased from the St Paul Water Utility, <br /> <br />Council Member Nelson indicated she did not understand where C-l and P-l were on the <br />map. <br /> <br />Mayor Swedberg explained where it as and said it delineates flood plain and said that <br />whether or not it exists in Ordinance #4 does not make it illegal and those things are <br />correctable, He then said as far as he is concerned, it makes a definition of category C-l <br />as flood plain and that is for places where you do not want to have anyone build on. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that flood plain is not a zoning so <br />Ordinance #4 would not address it <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated there was flood plain in the middle of the <br />City with residential zoning, <br /> <br />My. Gonyea indicated that Rice Creek does have a setback of 100 feet and a setback of75 <br />feet for grading so there would be no grading within the setbacks from the channel. He <br />also indicated that the P-l area would likely fall under a drainage and utility easement, <br /> <br />Council Member Nelson indicated she felt that Rice Creek Watershed would take care of <br />this issue, <br /> <br />VOTE: Aves -l(Swedbere:). Navs - 4. Motion failed. <br /> <br />Page 9 of 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.