My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-11-09 CC
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
2005-11-09 CC
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2006 2:38:08 PM
Creation date
12/2/2005 9:07:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />November 9, 2005 <br />2. 1601 LaMotte Drive (Update) <br /> <br />Mr. Larson said a purchase agreement would be provided within 60 days and closing <br />would be scheduled soon thereafter. <br /> <br />Council Member Lee asked if the fence could be removed once the purchase agreement is <br />received. Mr. Hoeft answered the fence should remain until the closing. <br /> <br />Mayor Capra asked if the seller could be required to certify that no toxic materials have <br />been stored on the site. Mr. Hoeft answered the seller is only required to disclose what <br />they know. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar thanked the Mayor and Mr. Larson for all of their work on this <br />issue. <br /> <br />Mayor Capra suggested that the Parks and Recreation Department consider names for this <br />parcel prior to spring. Perhaps a citywide contest to celebrate the sesquicentennial. <br /> <br />No action needed. <br /> <br />1. Personnel Policy-Resolution #05-053 (Page 124-171) <br /> <br />Mayor Capra asked if required sensitivity training was included in the Policy. Mr. <br />Larson answered no. <br /> <br />Mayor Capra suggested that an annual review of the policy be required, as it has been <br />recommended by the City Attorney. <br /> <br />There was discussion on ways to implement the annual review practice. <br /> <br />Council Member Lee asked if the policy had any conflicts with union requirements. Mr. <br />Larson answered no. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar asked how the work breaks were defined and included in the <br />policy and was directed to Section 6.4 of the policy. <br /> <br />In response to the sensitivity training issue, Mr. Hoeft explained that the policy is <br />adequate, but additional training could be required annually, or as part of the employee <br />review process. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar suggested that employees be required to sign an affidavit of <br />receiving annual sensitivity training. Mr. Larson suggested that staff consult the League <br />(of Cities) as to how best to deal with this issue. <br /> <br />Page 7 of 9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.