Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />ILLING LID. <br /> <br />CONSULTANTS AND CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS <br /> <br />July 10, 2002 <br /> <br />. J <br /> <br />Dean R Ager, CPA <br />Thomas L Sykes, CPA <br />Michael S. Altman, CPA <br />William]. Gravelle, CPA <br />Deborah J. Medlin. CPA <br />Darla R. Benoit, CPA <br /> <br />To the Partners <br />Abele. Eick & Mey~r~, LLP <br /> <br />We have reviewed the system of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of Alida, Eick & <br />Meyers, LLP (the fimi) in effect for th~ year ended May 31, 2002. .A system of qual~ control <br />encompasses the firm's organiz~tional structure and the policies adopted and proce~ures established to <br />provide it with reasonable assurance of conforming with professional standards. The elements of quality <br />control are ~escribed in the Statements on Quality.Control Standards issued by the American Institute of <br />Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). The design of the system and compliance with it are the <br />responsibility of the firm. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the design of the system, and the <br />firm's compliance with the system based on our review. <br /> <br />Our review. was condu~ed in accordance with standards established by the Peer Review Board of the <br />AICPA. In performing our rev~ew, we obtained an understanding of the system of quality control for the <br />firm's accounting and auditing. practice. In addit!on. we tested compliance with tnti firm's quality control <br />policies and procedures to the extent we considered appropriate. These tests covered the application of <br />the firmis policies and pr~cedures on selected engagements: Because our review was based on . <br />sele~ive tests, it would not necessarily dis~lose all weaknesses in the system of quality control or ail <br />instances of 'apt< of compliance with it. <br /> <br />. . <br /> <br />B.ecause. there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any system of quality control, departures <br />from the system may occur and 110t be detected_ Also, projection of any evaluation of a system of quality <br />control to futlire periods is subject to the risk that the system of quality control may become inadequate <br />because of changes in conditions, or because the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures. <br />may deteriorate. . . <br /> <br />In our opinion, the syst~m of quality control for the accounting and auditing practice of Abdo, Eick & <br />Meyers. LLP in effect for the year ended May 31, 2002. has been designed to meet the requirements of <br />tbe quality control standards for an. accounting and auditing praCtice established by t~e AICPA and was <br />complied with during the year then ended to provide the firm with reasonable assurance of conforming <br />with professional standards. <br /> <br />E~J <br /> <br /> <br />.~ <br /> <br />600 Wells Fargo Center · 230 West Superior Street · Duluth, MN 55802.1953 - Phone 218.722-4705 . Fax 218-722.8589 <br />80700quet Avenue · Coquet. MN 55720.1677 · Phone 218.879-1503 · Fax 218.879-6240' <br />Suite 228 · illS Tower Avenue · Superior. WI 54880 · Phone 715-39+6621 · Fax 7l5- 39+5629 <br />www.eikillcom <br /> <br />3/t; <br />