My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-11-14 P & Z
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2000-2022
>
2000
>
2000-11-14 P & Z
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2006 3:01:43 PM
Creation date
12/14/2005 11:25:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Centerville <br />Planning & Zoning Commission <br />November 14,2000 <br /> <br />Commissioner De Vine questioned whether Council Liaison Vickers' property had <br />electrical fencing. Council Liaison Vickers stated she did not but thought there was old <br />barbwire fencing located on your property. Commissioner DeVine stated he did not feel <br />the need to amend Ordinance #4. <br /> <br />2. Mr. Terry Sager - Mini-Storage <br /> <br />Mr. Terry Sager and his partner, Ed Sadeline were present and requested the <br />Commission's willingness in allowing a mini-storage facility in Centerville. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brainard questioned whether the facility would have an on-site attendant. <br />Mr. Sadeline stated it would not. <br /> <br />Mr. March stated that previously a proposal for mini-storage had been denied due to <br />limited space in the industrial park, the facility did not use city utilities, and did not create <br />jobs for the City. <br /> <br />Mr. Carter requested clarification on the location of the proposed mini-storage facility. <br />Mr. Sager stated that it would be located on the east side of the industrial park property. <br />Mr. Carter stated that he would prefer a mini-storage facility to an apartment complex or <br />some industrial use that would generate a lot of traffic. <br /> <br />Mr. March questioned the size and valuation of the building that was being proposed. <br />Mr. Sadeline stated that he did not have the exact dimensions at this time but would <br />forward them to the Commission in the near future. <br /> <br />Commissioner De Vine stated that the size and valuation of the building would weigh <br />heavily on his decision on whether or not to grant the request to build a mini-storage <br />facility. <br /> <br />Mr. Sadeline thanked the Planning and Zoning Commission for its time. <br /> <br />IV. OLD BUSINESS <br /> <br />None. <br /> <br />v. NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br />1. Schlavin Variance Request <br /> <br />Chairperson Hanson questioned whether Mr. Schlavin had a sign on the exterior of his <br />home/office. Mr. Schlavin stated that a sign is installed in his front yard, but not on the <br />home/office. <br /> <br />Commissioner DeVine stated that Mr. Schlavin's situation was unique; it did not fit the <br />requirements for granting a variance. Commissioner DeVine suggested that Mr. Schlavin <br />bring his tax statement to the next work session scheduled. <br /> <br />Page 7 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.