My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2000-11-14 P & Z
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
2000-2022
>
2000
>
2000-11-14 P & Z
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2006 3:01:43 PM
Creation date
12/14/2005 11:25:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />~ <br /> <br />City of Centerville <br />Planning & Zoning Commission <br />November 14,2000 <br /> <br />Mr. March stated that it is unrealistic to assume that all approvals required for the <br />development could be obtained by December 15, 2000. <br /> <br />Chairperson Hanson told Ground Development that the City appreciated his show of <br />good faith in addressing all the issues raised by the City and residents. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Brainard. seconded by Commissioner Killian to deny <br />approval of the Ground Development Preliminary Plat - PUD. All in favor. Motion <br />carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers thanked members of the audience for their input <br />regarding this issue. Council Liaison Broussard Vickers stated that the City has a <br />Comprehensive Plan for development and the school district has had and is aware of. <br />The development discussed fits within the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan. The <br />City of Centerville could stop development, but neighboring communities such as Lino <br />Lakes are not required to do so. Therefore, the City of Lino Lakes could continue to <br />develop and send children to Centerville schools. The City of Centerville is a developing <br />community and legally the City cannot stop the development from coming in unless it has <br />just cause. <br /> <br />3. Ordinance #4 Amendments <br /> <br />Mr. March submitted information concerning possible amendments to Ordinance #4 and <br />asked the Commissioners to review the information and bring any modifications or <br />suggestions to the work session. <br /> <br />VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br /> <br />Commissioner Brainard noted his displeasure with the City Council for granting a <br />variance request the Planning and Zoning Commission had recommended denial. He felt <br />the request was granted for a purely political reason and opened the City up for legal <br />liability. He requested that in the future when Council goes against the recommendation <br />of the Planning and Zoning Commission and grants a variance, the Council be required to <br />provide specific examples as to how the requirements for the variance were met. <br />Commissioner Kilian agreed with Commissioner Brainard on this matter. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers indicated she was not at the meeting the <br />Commissioners were referring to but would bring the comments of Commissioner <br />Brainard and Kilian to the Council. <br /> <br />VII. CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES <br /> <br />1. October 3, 2000 Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />Chairperson Hanson requested the seconded portion of the first motion on Page 13 be <br />changed from "Hanson" to "LaMotte". <br /> <br />Page 9 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.