Laserfiche WebLink
<br />> <br /> <br />The United States Supreme Court has rejected the argument that the unavailabiliJr of <br />the class-action device in arbitration proceedings precludes agreements to arbitrate. In <br />Minnesota, as under the federal rules, the class action is a procedural device, rather <br />than a substantive part of any cause of action.23 Thus, just as parties may waive their <br />right to a judicial forum, they may waive their right to the procedures attendant to that <br />forum.24 . <br /> <br />The. Arbitration Provisions regarding limitation of remedies also are mutual and <br />reasonable under the circumstances. Those provisions allow AT&T Broadband to limit <br />the costs of litigation and pass those savings on to consumers in the form of lower prices <br />for services.25 <br /> <br />AT&T Broadband's method of providing notice to consumers that the Arbitration <br />Provisions was proper. <br /> <br />We do not agree that A T& T Broadband's customers received inadequate notice <br />of amendments to the Arbitration Provisions. AT&T Broadband purposefully notified <br />. customers of the change in the terms of the CSAs through orominent notices <br />communicated to customers in their billing statements. Customers not only received a <br />copy of the new terms as an insert to their bill, thev also received a blue notice <br />document. seoaratelv included in the invoice envelooe. and which announced the <br />chanaed terms. This blue notice document was headlined "Important Legal Notice" and <br />urged consumers to read the details. The text of the blue document read as follows: <br /> <br />IMPORTANT LEGAL NOTICE <br /> <br />INCLUDED IN THIS MONTH'S BILLING STATEMENT IS A REVISED <br />VERSION OF AT&T BROADBAND'S NOTICE TO CONSUMERS <br />REGARDING POLICIES, COMPLAINT PROCEDURES AND DISPUTE <br />RESOLUTION (THE "NOTICE"). . . <br /> <br />THE NOTICE CONTAINS IMPORTANT INFORMATION CONCERNING <br />YOUR USE OF AT&T BROADBAND'S SERVICES. AMONG OTHER <br />CHANGES, WE HAVE IMPLEMENTED A NEW COMPLAINT <br />RESOLUTION PROCEDURE INCLUDING PROVISIONS FOR FINAL <br />AND BINDING ARBITRATION OF DISPUTES. THESE PROVISIONS <br />AFFECT LEGAL RIGHTS THAT YOU MAY HAVE HAD PREVIOUSLY. <br />IT IS IMPORTANT THAT YOU READ THE NOTICE CAREFULLY. <br /> <br />THE POLICIES AND PRACTICES CONTAINED IN THE NOTICE WILL <br />BECOME EFFECTIVE THIRTY (30) DAYS AFTER THE DATE OF THE <br />ENCLOSED STATEMENT. YOUR CONTINUED USE OF AT&T <br />BROADBAND SERVICES AFTER THIRTY (30) DAYS OPERATES AS <br />YOUR CONSENT TO THESE POLICIES AND PRACTICES. <br /> <br />22 See Gilmer, 500 U.S. at 32. <br />23 Compare Minn. R. Civ. P. 23 with Fed. R. Civ. P.23. <br />24 See Johnson, 225 F.3d at 369 (characterizing class action as procedural device rather <br />than substantive right). <br />25 See Christopher R. Drahozal, 2001 U. III. L. Rev. 695, 761-62 (2001) (explaining <br />reasonable motivations for contractual waiver of punitive damages). <br /> <br />6 <br />P.41 <br />