My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999-09-07 P & Z
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
1999-09-07 P & Z
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2006 3:02:47 PM
Creation date
12/14/2005 12:08:13 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />... <br /> <br />building being proposed is 11,800 square feet, and exceeds the minimum lot and building size per <br />City Ordinance. Although the two to four available spots have not yet been leased, the proposed <br />building will be able to accommodate businesses on the first and second floor of the building. The <br />proposed building has four overhead drive in doors with a double loading dock that could be split <br />into four separate bays. The proposed site also included twelve parking stalls in the front of the <br />building, along with a row of parking on the side of the building. A question on the state required <br />handicap stalls was addressed, and noted as a contingency on the site. <br /> <br />Mr. March explained that normally in the past, the Planning and Zoning Commission would <br />discuss the impact of the building on the City, including the effect on the tax base. Mr. March <br />indicated that prior to his administration, the City had a checklist incorporating different <br />requirements that needed to be addressed and met by the developer before acceptance of the plan. <br />Mr. March indicated a revised checklist is currently being drafted, and named protection for City <br />Staff as well as the Developer as a major benefit of the checklist procedure. <br /> <br />Council member Vickers added the job of the Planning and Zoning Commission at this point <br />would be to determine if the building type and style was appropriate for the City, and if the <br />building meets the requirements of the City Zoning Ordinance. The Commission should then <br />make a motion to City Council with their recommendation based on discussed contingencies. <br /> <br />Motion by Mr. Hanson. seconded by Mr. DeVine to ftCommend City Council approve the <br />Eibensteiner building plans contingent on the review and ap>>roval of the City Attorney. <br />City Engjneer and Chief of ponce. along with providine evidence that drain8le and ADA <br />requirements have been met. AD in favor. Motion carried. <br /> <br />CONSIDERATION OF MINUTES <br /> <br />August 7, 1999 Planning and Zoning Minutes <br /> <br />Motion by Mr. DeVine. seconded by Mr. Kilian to approve the August 3. 1999 Planning <br />and Zonine meeting minutes. AD in favor. Motion carried <br /> <br />ADJOURN <br /> <br />Motion by Mr. LaM~tte seconded by Mr. Hanson to adjourn the Aupst 3. 1999 Planning <br />and Zoning meeting at 7:30 p.m. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br /> <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.