Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Planning &- Zoning- M1ly 4. 1999 <br /> <br />The Commission explained the neighboring property owner was granted a variance due to <br />the-factthat-there.was no gaaage on site:-. AIso;-Oth~l plopeltyownersenjoy-rightsthat <br />are not shared by the neighboring property. <br /> <br />The-€ommission.discussed: <br />OLdinance #4 Section:6S:63-1 Speciarcodditioas-and.circumstances-Wlit w~ch <br />are peculiar to the land, structure. or building involved and do not result from the <br />l:I."tiuns of the petitiol1~. <br /> <br />The Commission discussed: <br />* Possible.safety-haza{ds <br />IlL- Dilapidated. buildings-may be con.:k:umed.based-onthe recently-adopted h~g <br />code. . <br /> <br />Ms; Linda- Broussard-Vickers eAplessed concem aboutnon--conforming issues and the <br />tabling of similar types of items. Ms. Broussard Vickers suggested to table until after <br />6rdinance #4 ~ estabns~ed. <br /> <br />M~ti61k by binda-.Broua$Ald Vicke..s, .lta;~lkdedbrAt bIMotte to tAble this ~est <br />until the Commission completes the research on Ordinance #4. Motion carried . <br />unanimou~ly. <br /> <br />€entenniat Sehool.Dist.'id ... VH...iH.d&;~ l'e(JuClI ro. SiJ;1l 1a8~ailation <br /> <br />The Commission discussed, in great depth, any way to grant the variance in conjunction <br />with.Ordinance-H4~ Secti,on: <br />65.03-1 <br />65..~-2 <br />65.03-3 <br />65:03-4 <br /> <br />Mr:- PaIzer-suggested.wherrthe.Coinallssion It<Wlites 01dinance.#4: Signs; tha.t pe~ps <br />the provision should be considered for properties contiguous to County Roads. <br /> <br />'fhe-Commission.suggested- Staff measw e the-right-of-way.and. easement-distance. 'the <br />Commission felt safer having the sign installed closer to Main Street. Furthermore. the <br />sign-ordinance.will need to- be-updated-itr order-to-consider pending concerns. <br /> <br />Motion by Linda Broussard Vickers, seconded by Brain Hanson to table the <br />CentenniafSdlool. District's variance-request1o-install-a-sign based-on-thefact-tbat <br />it does not conform to the variance standards, and to update the sign ordinance in <br />an-.attempt.to.re-address-the-request-io.the future;- . Motion -carried unanimou~ly. <br /> <br />DISCUSSION ITEMS: <br /> <br />4 <br />