My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1999-04-06 P & Z
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
1999-04-06 P & Z
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2006 3:02:49 PM
Creation date
12/14/2005 12:17:42 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />.' , <br /> <br />~" <br />.: ' <br /> <br />l, <br />'~ . . ' <br /> <br />Mr. Brian Patterson (1975 -73 Street) requested clarification on the water drainage IPld <br />mitigation. <br /> <br />Ms. Jennifer Steward (t~5-73nl'Street). questioned1he dift'erencebetween an R2 .;1'UD <br />and R5 zoning. Ms. Broussard Vickers noted the PUD is to embrace the natural pniperty <br />features and it authorizes some smaller lots. <br /> <br />Mr. TotaKennedy (19'1S~ Street).-w8s concemed.for..children safety:ifthey,attemp{to <br />access. a city park via 2fih'AVenue..HMt..March suggested that an easemenrcanber - ~ <br />included-between lots }6-amt-tt; fox futw~ tlil.ilway~. - <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Ms. Steward questionectiflhe-ro.w.of:ttees.-betweentbe.proposed devetopment.an4nm--- <br />Streets-would be preserved:' Mr;R:ehbeinhoped'to'save'the row ofn-ees-since ~eii <br />preservation would benefit the property and the sale of the same. <br /> <br />Motion' by-Mr. Buckbeet seconded by~' Hansonto'dose the pub6e'~I. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />B~ Prdinainary PIat-(Deer Pass)-... Mr;'Gendd"Rebbein <br /> <br />Alternate Chair Broussard Vickers opened the discussion:-' <br /> <br />MotioD-by'Mr. Hanson-;~uDded byMr..-Bu~bce-ttrdose the public hea;ag. <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />c. Rezone Requesr- R%-tcret-(t164-MailrStreet) Mr. Roger-KoIsted <br /> <br />Alternate Chair Broussard Vickers informed the crowd that the applicant, Mr. Raker <br />Kotstedverbally resclnded-hisTequestto' x ~l;on~.the'PIU}R3 Ly stated.' How~ver, the <br />Commission noted an interest to hear residents comments. J <br /> <br />Ms-; tindaPatterson (106S-'Dupr~ Roadlquestioned1heeommission-uto1he~g <br />why the request was rescinded. Ms. Gaustad replied that one of the two financial <br />institutions did not believe thattmnmnmunitywupopulated enoug1rta-support-.~o <br />financial institutions. j <br /> <br />Ms. Cany Sanders (70s0-DupI~ R.oad)wondca~ why the'City WOuktCOUdeI ttT~ne <br />the proposed property. Alternate Chair Brossard Vickers explained that any property <br />owner'reserves the rightttHequestttr'rezone1heit pIOperty. The Citymust'hear'jall <br />requests presented. <br /> <br />Councilmember Nelson-noted-receipt'oftwo'E.;mails;Mary Jo Helmbrecht andUdo-''fd <br />Cindy Wegmenn (see attached). <br /> <br />Ms. Norma Essex (733-l'Mill-RoadTquestioned.the-diffeI'ence betweenR2;RZA; and-Bt: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.