My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1998-09-01 P & Z
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1998
>
1998-09-01 P & Z
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2006 3:03:03 PM
Creation date
12/14/2005 1:44:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />MEMORANDUM <br /> <br />Date: August 28, 1998 <br /> <br />To: Planning and Zoning Commission <br />From: Paul Patzer, Public Works Director/Building Offi~ <br />Re: Buechler Estates Preliminary Plat <br /> <br />I have reviewed the proposed lot subdivision on Mound Trail and offer the following <br />comments and suggestions. <br /> <br />1. The roadway in this area is currently broken asphalt with gravel which is susceptible to <br />frost heaves in the winter. The city may want to look at reconstructing this roadway with <br />some contributions from the developer and the City of Lino Lakes in conjunction with <br />this project. <br /> <br />2. This area has the worst soils in CenterviIle according to the Anoka County soils map <br />and I would recommend that the Commission require son borings on each of the five <br />proposed house pad sites to determine the appropriate correction work which will. need to <br />be completed to provide suitable buil.ding sites. <br /> <br />3. Lots 1 and 5 show that the proposed drainage will flow onto the adjoining lots. I <br />realize this may save some of the natural features but with the drainage concerns in town, <br />maybe some more thought could be put into this design. <br /> <br />4. The existing drainage on the eastern portion of the lot which flows into the lake needs <br />to be in a drainage easement. A Rice Creek Watershed Permit is also required for this <br />development. The plan shows that this existing drainage area at the eastern portion of the <br />lot in the existing drainage swale is higher than the proposed culvert system at the <br />roadway ditch. This will. hold water in the ditch system. <br /> <br />5. The proposed drainage swale in the roadway ditch doesn't meet the City's requirement <br />of a 1% m1nlmnm grade. <br /> <br />6. The proposed easement for the sanitary sewer is ten feet and the city requires twenty <br />feet to match the existing easement to the east. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.