My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-07-28 WS & CC Meeting
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2004
>
2004-07-28 WS & CC Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2009 8:25:00 AM
Creation date
6/19/2009 8:19:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
271
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />July 15,2004 <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />My second suggestion relates to layoff. Layoffs may occur even when a position is not <br />eliminated - for example, a temporary lack of funds or disaster that results in the temporary <br />discontinuing of the function. I suggest: <br /> <br />Lay-Off: The separation of an Employee from employment due to elimination of a <br />position: lack of funds or other reason determined bv the City Council. <br /> <br />I suggest eliminating the Reduction in Work Force defInition in that it is defined and addressed <br />at Section 5.4. <br /> <br />3.4 Classification of Job Duties. Salary Range. I suggest eliminating factor D) in that the cost <br />of living is generally considered in making an overall adjustment (the general increase or <br />.',decrease) to the salary plan rather than the initial assignment of the position within the plan. I <br />suggest eliminating factor E) in that fringe benefIts would not playa part in the initial assignment <br />of points to a position. Elimination of these factors would also assist the City in maintaining its <br />pay equity obligations of focusing on factors A, B and C. <br /> <br />3.4 ClassifIcation of Job Duties. Approval. I suggest allowing the Councii discretion to leave <br />the salary range for each classification intact simply by inaction. I suggest that the Council not <br />place any obligation on itself to annually adopt salary ranges for each classification. In many <br />instances, the salary range for each classifIcation will remain the same from year to year. The <br />only action by the City Council in this event is to decide whether to make a general adjustment to <br />the salary table. My suggested language is as follows: <br /> <br />Each fIscal year, the City Council shall review the pay plan and make any changes it <br />determines are necessary and adapt salary ranges for each elasnification. The City <br />Council may modify salary ranges at any time. The City Council shall adopt hourly rates <br />of pay for all positions not covered by the classifIcation and pay plan. <br /> <br />4.1 Vacancies. General. I suggest clarifying that this only applies to vacancies that the Council <br />determines to fIll. My suggested language is as follows: <br /> <br />Vacant positions that the City Council chooses to fill will be filled on the basis of a <br />regular or temporary appointment and may be made on a full-time or part-time basis. <br /> <br />4.8 Union Representation. I suggest adding a clarification that "fair share fees" only apply to <br />non members in bargaining unit positions. My suggested language is as follows: <br /> <br />However, under the Act, the union may require individuals in a represented bargaining <br />unit who are not members of the union to contribute a "fair share fee." <br /> <br />4.9 Probationary Appointments. Termination during Probationary Appointments. I suggest <br />eliminating the third sentence: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.