My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-08-25 WS & CC Meeting
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2004
>
2004-08-25 WS & CC Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2009 8:49:16 AM
Creation date
6/19/2009 8:46:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
140
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />How to IdentitY and Manage Dutch Elm Disease <br /> <br />Page 14 of16 <br /> <br />personal injury or property damage. <br /> <br />AnOther option in wild areas or natural stands, other than accepting losses from DED, is to <br />eliminate all elms and manage for alternative species. However, it is often desirable to <br />retain elms for biodiversity, aesthetic, economic, or other reasons. <br /> <br />Deciding Which Management <br />Practices to Use <br /> <br />Different management strategies will be applicable depending on whether you are worldng <br />with a community program or trying to protect individual trees. In a community program, <br />the objective will be to protect a population of elms. Individual landowners, however, may <br />have no control over what neighbors do with their elms but may want to protect or save <br />their own trees. The amount of money an individual or community is able to spend will also <br />vary. <br /> <br />Where you have no control over the management of surrounding trees, the only options <br />available are treatments to protect or save individual trees. Good sanitation practices and <br />disruption of root grafts are necessary on individual properties, but these practices alone <br />will not protect a tree from disease transmission by bark beetles from other properties. <br />Preventive fungicide injection, eradicative pruning and fungicide injection, and insecticide <br />treatment are generally the only options available for individual trees. <br /> <br />In a community program, resources to spend on individual trees may be low, but there is <br />more opportunity to manage populations of elms. Where there are continuous elms, root <br />graft disruption is essential to halt the spread. Sanitation is key to reducing beetle and DED <br />populations, and is effective. Community ordinances can be established to encourage <br />prompt removal of diseased trees and prevent the storage of elm wood with bark intact. <br />Education will help citizens understand the importance and benefits of working together to <br />manage DED. As resources allow, preventive treatment, eradicative treatment and <br />insecticides can be used to augment a program. If you are working with a community with a <br />significant elm resource, become familiar with the literature listed below and with what has <br />worked well in other communities. <br /> <br />The impact of DED on our urban forests has been massive. Despite the losses, elms should <br />and will continue to be a component of many urban forests. We have an opportunity to <br />consider what trees will compose the future urban forest, and we can learn from the past. <br />Landowners and communities can and should choose carefully what types of trees to plant <br />and where to plant them. <br /> <br />Bibliography <br /> <br />. Allison, J. R., and G. F. Gregory. 1979. How to Save Dutch Elm Diseased Trees by <br />Pruning. USDA FS publication NA-GR-9. <br />. Ascerno, M. E., and R. P. Wawrzynski. 1993. Native Elm Bark Beetle Control. <br /> <br />http://www.na.fs.fed.uslspfolpubslhowtoslht_dedlht_ded.htm <br /> <br />8/25/2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.