My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-10-27 CC Closed WS & Meeting
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2004
>
2004-10-27 CC Closed WS & Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2009 10:02:24 AM
Creation date
6/19/2009 9:58:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
161
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Centerville <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br />October 13,2004 <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Mr. and Mrs. Keith Okan 1841 Center Street (Driveway Issue) <br /> <br />Mr. Okan appeared before Council and asked for an update on the driveway situation. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that the information provided to Staff was dated in May of <br />2004. <br /> <br />Mr. Okan indicated that he did not have any contract information dated when the <br />concrete was installed but he does have dated warranty information that states that <br />duracrete was used. <br /> <br />Council discussed the matter with Mr. Okan and Mr. Okan restated the fact that his <br />existing driveway was not restored to the way it was before construction as he was told it <br />would be. <br /> <br />Council agreed that the flares should be replaced but there was consensus that the City is <br />not responsible for anything in the right of way, including driveways. And, upon the <br />information from the City Engineer, the concrete used by the City is suitable for <br />residential vehicle traffic and comes with a one-year warranty. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar indicated that he thinks that ripping up this concrete and installing <br />more expensive, higher strength concrete, opens the City up to having many, many <br />requests for the same thing. He then said he is very concerned that this would set a <br />precedent for the City paying to replace things in the right of way. <br /> <br />5. Water Tower <br /> <br />Motion bv Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded bv Council Member <br />Caura to remove the Iiehtinl! from the water tower. Ayes - 4. Nays - l(Sweeney). <br />Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />6. SWMP <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded by Council Member <br />Caora to table this to the next meetinl!. All in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />Council asked that the shoreland management ordinance be referred to the Planning <br />Commission for consideration and recommendation of approval. <br /> <br />7. Eagle Pass Pond <br /> <br />Council asked Staff to determine how much it would cost to dredge out the inlet and <br />whether this project is more important than another project on the list. <br /> <br />Page 9 of 10 <br /> <br />1- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.