My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-03-10 CC Meeting
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2004
>
2004-03-10 CC Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2009 10:14:43 AM
Creation date
6/19/2009 10:12:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
193
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that Mr. Palzer has spoken to them and has been told that it <br />did not involve Centerville. <br /> <br />Ms. Wirth said you do have a BMP sheet on inspecting ponds annually and they are <br />enforceable and you have down Public Works Mr. Palzer as the person responsible for <br />that. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar commented that engineering wise that is why the one was dredged <br />and all have been reviewed but the City does not have the budget to do all 35 ponds at <br />one time. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated she would like to have an engineer look at <br />it every five years or so in addition to yearly staff inspections. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that Mr. Palzer can do it and as part of the pond dredging <br />plan established that will happen _ J J _"^ on an annual basis. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar indicated he wanted this one that the City thought was being done <br />to be researched and taken care of. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft asked whether Phase II drains to that pond. <br /> <br />Nancy Fitzgerald of 7003 Dupre indicated they put up silt fencing but in her area the <br />fencing was put up and fell down and no one made them put it back. She said she <br />believes that the drain that kept out sediment either fell out or was not there and caused <br />sediment. She then asked, after the initial approval to do these construction projects, who <br />is responsible for following up on seeing that the silt fencing is kept in place to avoid this <br />type of issue. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers indicated that City Staff and the engineering Staff <br />and what the City runs into is an enforcement issue and to keep notifYing the developer to <br />do it and they do not then they say they did and then it is down again and the City fights a <br />continuous circle on that project and has not perfected the ability to enforce the things as <br />consistently as the City would have liked to. <br /> <br />Mayor Sweeney asked if the City could, since part of developers agreement requires <br />maintaining silt fence, red tag the construction and stop all work until the silt fencing has <br />been restored. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft said that as long as it is servicing that building and it has ongoing <br />construction he would think so. <br /> <br />Council Member Capra indicated the City could sweep the streets and charge them if not <br />done within 24 hours. <br /> <br />Page 10 of14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.