Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Office of the State Auditor <br />City Expenditures and the Public Purpose Doctrine <br />Page 3 <br /> <br />powers which have been expressly conferred." Mangold Midwest Co. <br />v. Village of RicJifield, 274 Minn. 347, 357, 143 N.W. 2d 813, 820 <br />(1966). <br /> <br />2. The expenditure must be made for a public purpose. <br />3. These requirements apply to "funds of govenunentalentities derived not only from <br />taxation but from other sources as well." Op. All'y Gen. 107-A-3 (Jan. 22, <br />1980). <br /> <br />See Minn. Const., art. X, ~ 1 ("Taxes . . . shall be levied and collected for public <br />purposes."); Visina v. Freeman, 89 N.W.2d 635 (1958) (courts generally construe <br />"public purpose" to mean "such an activity as will serve as a benefit to the community as <br />a body and which, at the same time, is directly related to the functions of government"); <br />Tousley v. Leach, 180 Minn. 293, 230 N.W. 788 (1930) (public funds may be used by <br />public entity if the purpose is a public one for which tax money may be used, there is <br />authority to make the expenditure, and the use is genuine); Op. All'y Gen. 59a-22 (Dec. <br />4, 1934) (regardless of how desirable or commendable the purpose may be, public funds <br />cannot be expended unless there is statutory or charter authority to do so). <br /> <br />B. Gifts/Donations to Private Individuals <br />(E.g., Consultants or Nonprofit Organizations) <br /> <br />Generally, no donations to people, non-profits, charities, etc., are perruitted unless based <br />upon specific statutory or charter authority. See, e.g., Ops. All'y Gen. 59a-3 (Aug. 19, <br />1947)(no authority to donate to 4-H Clubs), 442a-17 (Jan. 17, 1938)(Red Cross), 59- <br />A-3 (May 21, 1948) and (Sept. 28, 1933)(Boy Scouts). The ass\lll1ption is that a gift of <br />public funds to an individual or private entity necessarily serves a private rather than a <br />public purpose. See Ops. Att'y Gen. 107-a-3 (Jan. 22, 1980), 270-D (Aug. 12, 1977), <br />and 59a-22 (Dec. 4, 1934). <br /> <br />The Attorney Generalhas distinguished between statutory authorization to appropriate and <br />use money for a purpose, and authorization to contribute money to a body generally <br />committed to advancing a purpose. Op. Att'y Gen. 59-A-3 (Jan. 15, 1959) (can't give <br />money to an organization to use as it sees fit, but may contract with the organization to <br />perform on behalf of city activities authorized by statute). The following are specific <br />statutorily authorized appropriations: <br />