My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-02-25 WS & CC Meeting
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2004
>
2004-02-25 WS & CC Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/19/2009 10:35:48 AM
Creation date
6/19/2009 10:34:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
122
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />I - <br /> <br />Office of the State Auditor <br />City Expenditures and the Public Purpose Doctrine <br />Page 6 <br /> <br />necessary. See Op. Att'y Gen. 285a (Aug. 7, 1969)(Attomey General <br />deferred to library board's determination that meal was necessary so <br />invited guests could attend). <br /> <br />4. The OSA maintains that the purchase of alcohol at public expense does not serve <br />a public purpose. In addition, the expenditure of public funds for the expenses of <br />a spouse of a public employee or officer does not serve a public purpose. <br /> <br />E. Employee Social Events <br /> <br />Unless specific authority provides otherwise, employee social functions should not be paid <br />for with public funds. See Ops. Att'y Gen. 59A-22 (Jan. 8, 1957) (municipal corporation <br />may not imply authority to appropriate public revenue for celebrations, entertainments, <br />etc., quoting 15 McQuillin, Municipal Corporations, 3" ed., Sec. 39.22), and 59a-22 <br />(Nov. 23, 1966) (city Christmas party). <br /> <br />Comment: Many public entities fund employee social events through employee clubs. <br />Such clubs collect money from the employees, and have no involvement with the public <br />entity regarding the funds collected from the employees. Sometimes vending machine <br />proceeds are used by the employee clubs. A public entity appears to have at least three <br />options for the operation of vending machines in public spaces: <br /> <br />1. The public entity could be responsible for the vending machine. All disbursements <br />of vending machine proceeds would then need to comply with the public purpose <br />doctrine. <br />2. The public entity could contract with a private entity, which results in the public <br />entity receiving a commission from the vending machine sales. All commissions <br />collected by the public entity would need to comply with the public purpose <br />doctrine. <br />3. An employee club could operate the vending machines. In such cases, the OSA <br />would expectto see a written arm's-length contract between the public entity and <br />the employee club that would compensate the public entity for the licensed space <br />used by the vending machines, and set forth the liabilities of the parties with regard <br />to the machines and insurance. Proceeds of the vending machines would not be <br />considered public funds in such cases. Note: Vending machines operated by <br />employees in non-public places, such as in employee lunch rooms, would not <br />necessarily be public funds in the OSA's opinion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.