My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-06-09 Executive Session & CC Meeting
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2004
>
2004-06-09 Executive Session & CC Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2009 8:23:53 AM
Creation date
6/22/2009 8:22:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />MICHAEL UDIATHlUN JIH.. <br /> <br />7046 Brian Dr. a:n,,,,...illc, Mn. 55038 <br />CENTERVILLE, MN. 55038 <br /> <br />Phone 651.248.2793 <br />HomePl!<m< J-6.SH:l6.1217 <br /> <br />May 26, 2004 <br /> <br />City of Centervill~ <br />1880 Main StrllElt <br />Centerville, Mn. 55038 <br /> <br />City of Ceriterville Council Members, <br /> <br />Our names are Michael and Kathleen Johnson. We reside at 7046 Brian Or. As we stated in our prior <br />lelter to the council dated Feb. 08,2004, Your council meeting of Thurs. Jan. 29,2004 regarded proposed <br />improvements to Brian Dr. from Main Street to 150' North of Brian Court At that time Michael was <br />informed that the project would not really affect our property and that there would be no assessments to <br />our property for this project. We asked in our prior letter to have the council give us that assurment in <br />writing. We have been given no response. The project has moved ahead and completely been changed <br />regarding our property, without these cihanges being made public. (We heard abo\.llthem along with our <br />neighbor Ginger Rehbein, in the street when Tom Peterson came to talk with us both. Mike let Tom know <br />that this was not the stated plan at the council meeting on the project. He also let Tom Know he was not <br />in agreement As has been stated before, the plllnned improvements have already been done up to and <br />all parts that affect our property and the improvements already made are correct and functioning properly <br />-", ~:::oaSiar.:as:aildralnage'lssues'go;cAga,",:::as,the:picturesindicate:We:have:a 119Wculvert:olfer.CJearwater:c <br />Creek. Elevation and the Grade ha\{e been cihanged, new Curb and Gutter inStalled, Water has been <br />brought up into our property and stubbed, A new Sewer and a Storm drain are installed. Any further <br />changes to the already existing new improvements to our property will not "Benefif our property in any <br />way! All the issues that Tom Peterson brought up to us deal with the other side of the street including <br />the drainage issues. We are hearby requesting again for our side of the street to be left alone, any <br />removing of seid improvements that heve been already made on our side is a waste of money and is very <br />detrimental to our property and the neighborhood as a whole as cun:entlyour side of the street is straight <br />and appealing to the eye from one end of the street as well as the oiher. (See pictures) and we have no <br />drainage issues. Your prompt attentiOn to this matter is greatly appreciated. Thank You. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.