My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2004-05-12 CC Meeting
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Agenda Packets
>
1996-2022
>
2004
>
2004-05-12 CC Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/22/2009 8:47:46 AM
Creation date
6/22/2009 8:44:05 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
157
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City of Centerville <br />Apri114, 2004 <br />Council Meeting Minutes <br /> <br />Public Works Director Palzer stated they should probably go to the executive session on <br />that. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft stated that they couldn't go to executive session over that, and that it <br />was a matter of public record. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes stated this is the first she has heard about this issue. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft stated he was not sure why Public Works Director Palzer was <br />advocating a position for two people who had a problem with the way the process went, <br />and if these two people felt they were somehow not treated properly, there are certain <br />avenues they can follow. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft stated he didn't have any problem with Public Works Director Palzer <br />discussing his concerns about the criteria that were used, but he didn't want them to get <br />into a discussion about specific individuals who felt that they were aggrieved by the <br />process. He stated he thought the City's process had been legitimate. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers asked whether the two people chosen were qualified <br />to do the job, and Public Works Director patzer said that they were. Council Member <br />Broussard Vickers then stated that she had faith in the process that had been gone <br />through, and that she believed Ms. Moore-Sykes had expedited the process by bringing <br />forward the 13 qualified people to interview. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers. seconded by Mayor Sweeney. to <br />aoorove staff's recommendations for hirine two Public Works Maintenance <br />DOsitions. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar stated his concern over the criteria that Ms. Moore-Sykes had used <br />on the 50 applicants. <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes again stated she wished Public Works Director Palzer had come to her <br />earlier because she had no idea who he was talking about. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers asked whether they could go into executive session. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft stated there was nothing to go to executive session for. <br /> <br />Council Member Paar stated since they were looking for public works employees that the <br />Public Works Director should have been the one to go through the intitial criteria on the <br />applications. <br /> <br />City Attorney Hoeft stated if they were going to go through the process again and use <br />different criteria, then they needed to apply the criteria to all 50 applicants and interview <br />the applicants who now met the criteria. <br /> <br />Page 8 of! 0 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.