Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />EAB adults must feed <br />on foliage before they <br />become reproduc. <br />tively mature. <br /> <br />~ <br /> <br />effective pheromone traps for EAB. However, <br />first emergence of EAB adults generally <br />occurs between 450-550 degree days (start- <br />ing date of January 1, base temperature of <br />50'F), which corresponds closely with full <br />bloom of black locust (Robinia pseudoacada). <br />For best results, consider two applications, <br />one at 500 DDso (as black locust approaches <br />full bloom) and a second spray four weeks <br />later. <br /> <br />How Effective Are <br />Insecticides for Control of <br />EAB? <br /> <br />Extensive testing of insecticides for control <br />of EAB has been conducted by researchers <br />at Michigan State University (MSU) and The <br />Ohio State University (OSU). Results of some <br />of the MSU trials are available at www.emer- <br />aldashborer.info. <br /> <br /> <br />;"!'p;e: <br /> <br />Efficacy of imidacloprid soil injections for con- <br />trolling EAB has been inconsistent; in some <br />trials EAB control was excellent, while others <br />yielded poor results. Differences in applica- <br />tion protocols and conditions of the trials <br />have varied considerably, making it difficult <br />to reach firm conclusions about sources of <br />variation in efficacy. For example, an MSU <br />study found that low-volume soil injections of <br />imidacloprid applied to small trees averag- <br />ing 4 inches in DBH (diameter of the trunk <br />at breast height) using the Kioritz applicator <br />(a hand-held device for making low-volume <br />injections) provided good control at one <br />site. However, control was poor at another <br />site where the same application protocols <br />were used to treat larger trees (13-inch DBH). <br />Imidacloprid levels may have been too low in <br />the larger trees to provide adequate control. <br />Higher pest pressure at the second site also <br />may have contributed to poor control in the <br />large trees. <br /> <br />In the same trials, high-pressure soil injections <br />of imidacloprid (applied in two concentric <br />rings, with one at the base of the tree and the <br />other halfway to the drip line of the canopy) <br />provided excellent control at one site. At <br />another site, however, soil injections applied <br />using the same rate, timing and application <br /> <br />method were completely ineffective, even <br />though tree size and infestation pressure <br />were very similar. It should be noted that <br />recent studies have shown that imidacloprid <br />soil injections made at the base of the trunk <br />result in more effective uptake than applica- <br />tions made on grid or circular patterns under <br />the canopy. <br /> <br />lmidacloprid soil drenches have also gen- <br />erated mixed results. In some studies <br />conducted by MSU and OSU researchers, <br />imidacloprid soil drenches have provided <br />excellent control of EAB. However, in other <br />studies, control has been inconsistent. Expe- <br />rience and research indicate that imidacloprid <br />soil drenches are most effective on smaller <br />trees and control of EAB on trees with a DBH <br />that exceeds 15 inches is less consistent. <br /> <br />This inconsistency may be due to the fact <br />that application rates for systemic insecticides <br />are based on amount of product per inch of <br />trunk diameter or circumference. As the DBH <br />of a tree increases, the amount of vascular <br />tissue, leaf area and biomass that must be <br />protected by the insecticide increases expo- <br />nentially. Consequently, for a particular appli- <br />cation rate, the amount of insecticide applied <br />as a function of tree size is proportionally <br />decreased as trunk diameter increases. <br />Hence, the DBH-based application rates that <br />effectiveiy protect relatively small trees can <br />be too low to effectively protect large trees. <br />Some systemic insecticide products address <br />this issue by increasing the application rate <br />for large trees. <br /> <br />In an OSU study with larger trees (15- to <br />22-inch DBH), Xytect™ (imidacloprid) soil <br />drenches provided consistent control of EAB <br />when applied experimentally at twice the rate <br />that was allowed at that time. Recently, the <br />Xytect™ label was modified to allow the use <br />of this higher rate, which we now recommend <br />when treating trees larger than 15-inch DBH. <br />Merit"' imidacloprid formulations, however, <br />are not labeled for application at this high <br />rate. Therefore, when treating trees greater <br />than 15-inch DBH with Merit"' soil treatments, <br />two applications are recommended, either <br />in the fall and again in the spring, or twice <br />in the spring, about four weeks apart (for <br />example in late April and again in late May). <br />This is not an option for Bayer Advanced™ <br />Tree and Shrub Insect Control and other <br /> <br />INSECTICIDE OPTIONS FOR PROTECTING ASH TREES FROM EMERAW ASH BORER <br />