My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-06-10 CC - Approved
Centerville
>
City Council
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
2009-06-10 CC - Approved
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2009 1:05:16 PM
Creation date
7/16/2009 1:04:54 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Centerville <br />City Council Meeting <br />June 10, 2009 <br /> Councilmember Fehrenbacher stated that he is willing to commit to temporarily doing the <br />signs. He added that this could be readdressed at the end of next year. He believes the <br />signs should be on the side of the road where the trail will be. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Lee stated that the Police Department needs to be made aware of these <br />signs. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Lee, seconded by Councilmember Paar, to approve the <br /> <br />expenditure of $700 for No Parking signs for the east side of Mill Road, until the City <br />Council decides they should be removed, with the final review by the end of 2010. All <br />in favor. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />VIII. NEW BUSINESS <br /> <br />st <br /> <br />1.Res. #09-015 – Adopting the Assessment Roll for the 21 Avenue/Backage Road <br />Improvements <br /> <br />Councilmember Paar requested that City Attorney Glaser respond to the comments made <br />by Sheehy’s attorney, Mr. Lee-O’Halloran. <br /> <br />Councilmember Lee stated that he is in agreement with the City Staff about the expected <br />increase in value. <br /> <br />Councilmember Fehrenbacher stated that he agrees with staff recommendation on the <br />$400,000 number. <br /> <br />City Attorney Glaser stated that when a party appeals an assessment to the District Court, <br />the Court does not decide what the number will be. If it believes the City’s number is <br />wrong, it will be sent back to the City. He noted that litigation could cost approximately <br />$20,000. <br /> <br />Councilmember Fehrenbacher inquired as to how they came up with the $20,500 number <br />for the partial credit. <br /> <br /> Discussion ensued <br /> <br />Councilmember Broussard Vickers stated that the prior assessment was realized in <br />appreciation when the partial was sold. She stated that she supports the findings of the <br />appraiser, City Administrator Larson, City Engineer Statz, and City Attorney Glaser. <br /> <br />Mayor Capra stated that she disagrees with the $154,000 number proposed by Sheehy. <br />She stated that she would agree to decrease the proposed assessment amount by the <br />$20,500 credit for the earlier assessment. <br /> <br />Motion by Council Member Broussard Vickers, seconded by Council Member Paar, <br /> <br />st <br />to approve Res. #09-015 – Adopting the Assessment Roll for the 21 Avenue/Backage <br />Road Improvements, (setting the Sheehy assessment at $379,000, taking into account <br />Page 6 of 10 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.