Laserfiche WebLink
<br />11-14-2001 01'21Pl'1 FROM <br /> <br />TO <br /> <br />6514298629 P.01 <br /> <br />November 14,2001 <br /> <br />TO: City of Centerville <br /> <br />I am writing in regards to a notice I received about my non-compliant shed that has <br />existed in its present location for approximately seven years. I understand that the <br />Planning Commission is considering amendments to the current zoning ordinance. [also <br />understand that there are several other sheds in the community that exist closer than six <br />feet to the primary structure. <br /> <br />The six foot separation is required by the \luilcling code for fire protection. Upon <br />researching the matter I have discovered that if a fire wall was installed on one side of my <br />shed, my shed could remain in its current location and be in conformance with existing <br />building codes. I would be Willing to make this investment because I have ordered siding <br />for my shed which matches my house. I also have substantial landscaping placed by a <br />previous owner that exists around the shed in its current location. <br /> <br />I request an extension of the time period for bringing this shed Into compliance. I further <br />request that the Planning Commission be asked to consider an amendment that would <br />allow sheds to be closer to the primary structure, if the shed is constructed to meet the <br />building and fue code standards. As you may recall, the mixed use district was created to <br />allow buildings to be adjacent to each other as long as the appropriate building codes <br />were met. <br /> <br />If the P+Z does not amend the ordinance, I will bring my shed into compliance. I will <br />al$o expect that this requirement will be unifonn and ClIlforced with aU of the non- <br />compliant sheds in the community, because I will incur a substantial cost if I am forced to <br />move mine. Thanks! Jim March <br /> <br />iOiAL P.01 <br /> <br />L_ <br />