My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-12-04 P & Z Packet
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2022
>
2001
>
2001-12-04 P & Z Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2009 1:49:05 PM
Creation date
7/17/2009 1:48:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />VI. DISCUSSION ITEMS <br /> <br />Ms. Moore-Sykes indicated that Mr. Michaels had sent in a letter asking that he be <br />allowed to either leave his storage shed in its existing location even though City Staff has <br />said it must be moved because it is too close to the house, or to have an extension to <br />spring to move the shed because new grass has been planted and he does not want to <br />disturb it. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wilharber asked how close the shed was to the house. <br /> <br />Commissioner Kilian indicated it must be 6 feet or less away from the house if the <br />inspector cited it. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers indicated that Staff had told Mr. Michaels that he did <br />not need a permit based on the size of the shed. She then indicated that the shed had <br />fallen down and was rebuilt. She further indicated that Staff did not have information as <br />to the close proximity of the shed to the house when the resident called to ask ifhe <br />needed a permit and determined he did not need one based on the size of the shed. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wilharber commented that the addition to Ordinance #4 to require a <br />nominal fee for a permit for this type of matter would eliminate this type of problem in <br />the future. <br /> <br />Commissioner DeVine indicated he felt the Commission should allow him time to spring <br />to move the shed. He then commented that there is another resident in the City that <br />received a letter from the City telling him his shed needed to be moved within 30 days. <br />He further commented that the shed has been there since the resident bought the home <br />and nobody complained. He did say, however, that the resident had pulled a permit to <br />add onto the house and the changes to Ordinance #4 gives the building official the <br />authority to cite for other violations. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers indicated the City was trying to improve the <br />ordinance going forward by making changes. She then commented that the situation, as <br />described, may be stretching the intent of the Ordinance. <br /> <br />Commissioner DeVine said he thinks it is weird that the building permit generated the <br />letter for the shed. He then commented that he thinks a witch hunt is going on in the City <br />because letters were sent to a lot of people wasting a lot of taxpayer money when the <br />letters were not correct. He further commented that he had received a letter indicating his <br />signs were illegal and they are not. <br /> <br />Council Liaison Broussard Vickers indicated that the City had been running without a <br />chief for too long and said that now that there is a City Administrator things should get <br />back to normal. She then commented that Council had directed the building official to <br />take a look around when at a resident's home for any obvious violations that could cause <br />a safety issue. <br /> <br />Page 21 of24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.