Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Forwarded to Council Members <br />Via e-mail on 2/1/01 at 2:46 p.m. <br /> <br />Mr. Bruce Luikart, 7130 Peterson Trail, questioned the type of lighting in the rear of the <br />building. Mr. Drilling stated that the lighting would be similar to the current strip mall. <br /> <br />Mr. Luikart questioned whether the rear, exterior of the building would be brick. Mr. <br />Drilling concurred. <br /> <br />Mayor Swedberg questioned Mr. Luikart as to his thoughts of the proposed strip mall. <br />Mr. Luikart stated that he could live with the building. <br /> <br />Mr. Jerry Engler, 7127 Shad Avenue, requested that the berm run along the north/south <br />jog of the property. Mr. Drilling stated that he had not planned to have a berm in that <br />location. Mr. Drilling also stated that there would be a six (6) foot fence installed on the <br />top of the berm and trees would run north to south on the property line on the Drilling <br />side of the fence. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson eXplained he was unable to comment on whether a berm along the <br />north/south jog would interfere with drainage, as he did not have a map with contours. <br /> <br />Mr. Engler asked Mr. Drilling if his trees and stakes would be replaced that were <br />removed by construction workers when the site was cleared. Mr. Drilling agreed to <br />restore Mr. Engler's property to its original state. <br /> <br />Mayor Swedberg requested that Mr. Hoeft investigate whether berming the north/south <br />jog would interfere with drainage. <br /> <br />Mr. Engler stated he desired the berm to be moved out to the west beyond where the <br />proposed fence is located. <br /> <br />Council Member Broussard Vickers stated that Mr. Engler's proposal was unacceptable <br />due to the separation of the berm and the fence. Council Member Broussard Vickers felt <br />that this would not be attractive. <br /> <br />Mr. March suggested waiting for Mr. Peterson's report on drainage prior to determining <br />whether a berm in the location would work. <br /> <br />Mr. Engler questioned the height of the trees that Mr. Drilling intended on installing. Mr. <br />March indicated Mr. Drilling needed to submit a detailed landscaping plan, which would <br />provide that information. Mr. Drilling indicated he would either leave the larger trees <br />currently located on the site or use five (5) or six (6) foot landscape evergreens dependent <br />upon County suggestion. <br /> <br />Mr. Engler asked that construction traffic not enter the lot from Shad Avenue. <br /> <br />Motion bv Council Member Nelson. seconded bv Council Member Broussard <br />Vickers to close the public hearinl!. All in favor. Motion carried unanimouslv. <br /> <br />Mayor Swedberg closed the public hearing at 6:50 p.m. <br /> <br />Page 4 of 14 <br />