My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2001-04-03 P & Z Agenda
Centerville
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Agenda Packets
>
1994-2022
>
2001
>
2001-04-03 P & Z Agenda
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2009 2:38:16 PM
Creation date
7/17/2009 2:36:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
General
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
147
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />October, several of the Parks and Recreation members and City Staff have been <br />questioned by youth as to the status of the skate park. <br /> <br />The consensus of the committee at this time is not to include the skate park on the grant <br />application. The City will not know ifit is approved for the grant until late summer, <br />which means the youth wouldn't be able to use it much, if at all, this year. The <br />Committee doesn't want to wait until then to begin construction of the skate park, they <br />want to begin construction/paving right away in the spring for use this summer. <br /> <br />Mr. Roger Barrett (6953 Centerville Rd.) questioned the status of the temporary road <br />running from Centerville Road to LaMotte Drive at the edge of the park. Mr. Barrett <br />commented that there is a steady flow of people using the road, and was interested in <br />knowing if it would be removed. Additionally, should the gates be open or closed? <br /> <br />Mr. March mentioned that there weren't any plans as of yet for removal ofthe road. <br />There is a possibility of converting it to a small paved trail. Either way, the gates should <br />be closed, and no vehicles should be using the road. Mr. March will check into it with <br />the Public Works Department. <br /> <br />Mr. March questioned the residents specifically on Centerville Road as to their feelings <br />on the ball field lights. Specifically, are they a nuisance, or would they be, if more were <br />added? <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson and Ms. DeVine concurred that there hasn't been any discussion related to <br />purchasing additional lights, but there has been discussion related to how much electrical <br />amps should be run, for future possibilities. Mr. Peterson stated it would be best to get as <br />much amps out to the fields as possible, to avoid going back and re-doing later. That <br />would be much more costly. <br /> <br />Mr. Tom Wilharber (6849 Centerville Rd.) commented that sometimes the lights are left <br />on all night long. He also agreed with Mr. Peterson and Ms. DeVine that it would be <br />better to run whatever electrical amps you may want in the future now, rather than the <br />possibility of having to tear it up and re-do it, should the Committee decide to add <br />additional lights. <br /> <br />Mr. Ben Henrich (6945 Centerville Rd.) requested a trail be created off of Center Street <br />running behind his house. <br /> <br />Mr. LeBlanc questioned if there was an easement behind Mr. Henrich's house that a trail <br />could be placed upon. Specifically, he mentioned rllnning a trail from the Hunters <br />Crossing Development to Meadow Lane, which would keep the youth offCenterville <br />Road. <br /> <br />Mr. W1lharber (6849 Centerville Rd.) questioned the status of purchasing the Church <br />property just north of LaMotte Park. <br /> <br />2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.